• 0 Posts
  • 967 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • They said they believe it was a mislabeled update. MS didn’t respond. Before criticizing others for their reading comprehension, I think you could work on yourself too.

    There is a world, and it may be ours, where MS purposefully pushes this out. As the end of the article makes clear, this will be only a minor issue for those with good backup (which they probably all should but they don’t), but for those who don’t they’ll be stuck with the new version and have to pay for the license of it. This is a large benefit to MS while they also get to pretend like it’s just a mistake and not having backups makes it your issue, not theirs.


  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoScience Memes@mander.xyzaerodynamics
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    At the speed cars move at, air behaves much like water. They’re both fluids. The faster you move the more resistance it has, but also the more dense the fluid is the more resistance it has. Moving quickly through the air is similar to moving slowly through water.


  • They addressed the elephant issue in their comment. I recommend you read it again. The summary is elephants evolved without predation, so they don’t bread in large numbers. Prey animals breed with the assumption a not-insignificant portion of their population will die prematurely due to predation. If this doesn’t happen then their population balloons until it consumes all available resources, then it collapses.

    This happens fairly frequently where we’ve removed predators from the ecosystem. Its why we promote deer hunting, for example. We’ve removed their natural predators, and if they aren’t culled then they will grow until they collapse. This is well understood and not controversial.

    I guess we could engineer the planet until this isn’t an issue, but that’ll take a few millenia and probably isn’t the best idea. Let nature be natural. It’d be fascist to assume it’s our domain to conquer and dominate into submission.


  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoComic Strips@lemmy.worldMoose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t know if it’s rare or incredibly hard to document. How do you attempt to track that? You’d need cameras in the water all over the place, all with an internet connection, and the water would have to be clear enough to see through, and the attack would have to happen right next to the camera, and someone would have to notice it.

    I guess the alternative is we put a tracker in a bunch of moose and then dissect a lot of orcas and try to find the trackers.

    It just seems like something we’re unlikely to know how common it is for a very long time, if ever.






  • It’s not the ideal solution, but it is approachable and understandable for technically averse users. I think it’s good to have, but I only used it for one package, and that was as a separate Steam install that included an old version of glibc that was used in a particular game’s (Squad) anti-cheat until it updated it.

    It’s good for a stable platform, but each package needs it’s own set of everything, which can be good (like the Steam example above having its own version of glibc instead of using the shared version on my system), it’s a lot of bloat. I’m not using it unless I require it for some reason, but again it’s nice to have around.


  • Yeah, this is basically what I was getting at. Like your Lemmy homepage, it should be managed by your instance, not a central power. Even if they’re perfect for you at first, it creates a thing that can be taken over or purchased without an alternative. Having a federated option makes it so you can find an instance you like or just spin up your own.


  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoComic Strips@lemmy.worldFirst World Problems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Nah man. You’re reading a lot into this. I was adding to the other comment asking what it adds? Does it add anything? Can you actually construct a reason?

    I know it’s easier to insult people and pretend like they’re the ones who are being ridiculous rather than doing the hard work of thinking, but it’s childish.


  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoComic Strips@lemmy.worldFirst World Problems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    How childish. I’m a white man in the US. It doesn’t offend me. I can understand how it can be offensive though. My critique isn’t valid because I’m offended or not, it’s because I used reasoning. Reasoning is valid, not your feelings about it.

    What do you think it added to the conversation? Do you not think perpetuating negative tropes is something that should be avoided?


  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksTwitch sucks!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I agree there should be moderation, but I don’t think there should be a moderator. You should, like Lemmy, be able to join an instance and that instance be able to moderate (or start your own instance). Anything else creates one voice that decides what’s acceptable, and gives you no option except to leave when that doesn’t match your views. You may agree with them at first, but it’s only a matter of time until you don’t.

    I don’t know how this service works, but I would hope (and assume) each instance gets to choose if they federated with other instances.


  • Cethin@lemmy.ziptoComic Strips@lemmy.worldFirst World Problems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    That’s certainly the inspiration, but it’s not particularly good or insightful. It’s really just trying to use a bleak made up stereotype to say something others have said without it. It should add to the conversation, but I don’t think this does that. It doesn’t give me any insight I didn’t already possess, and at best it perpetuates an idea that is wrong, if not outright racist.

    Just because you aren’t offended by it and don’t care doesn’t mean critique isn’t valid.



  • The apartment I was last in was several stories tall and, as such, the parking lot was shaded most of the day. Most of the parking spaces were even in a parking garage, so they get no sunlight. If you’re in an apartment, odds are this won’t work for you either.

    There are companies working on non-permanent balcony solar though, which isn’t as good as rooftop but still something. That’ll still only work for probably about half of apartments (facing east or west), but it’s inexpensive.

    We do need solutions for apartment dwellers, but a solar car probably isn’t it. We need to require a certain amount of availability of electric charging at apartments, and we also need better public transportation options and bike Infrastructure. This is a gimmick solution, not a real solution.


  • I think you might have jumped to the conclusion this company is trying to sell solar cars with unlimited (outside?) range.

    No, I jumped to the conclusion that it must be less effective than the alternative of rooftop solar + conventional EV. There is no world in which this is better. Rooftop solar will always have better solar access, and conventional EV will be cheaper because of effeciency of scale. This design is limited to powering the car only, and will never be as ideally situated as rooftop solar. The opportunity cost of this car will be worse than rooftop solar + EV. Sure, for people with unlimited money it might sell, but most of us don’t have that and have to compare cost to value and choose the best option for that.