My uninformed speculation is that they want to drop the bags on funds you have to bail out, pension funds for example, and then we’re effectively bailing out the people who bet on AI, not AI companies themselves.

And if we don’t, they still win, it’s pensions and savings that take the hit.

Common decency

Okay, but then line goes down and investors vote out the board.

And most stocks are held by a couple big Wall Street firms who own everything, not the public at large.

https://xkcd.com/37/

That they make money on? I mean more than the costs directly associated with those customers? Doubt it

They are kinda already outdated. The GPUs in use now are from the 2022 line mostly, 90% of the 2024 line is sitting in storage, and IDK about this year’s.

They are not actually building that DC capacity they sell either.

That’s a very literal translation, it’s means store checkout, bank teller’s window, ticket office or any similar place.

No, that’s just “rend”. “Sorrend” is order in the sense of one thing coming after another.

“Sor” means queue, so it’s “queue-order”.

Same reason shops would hire one black person only to clean the shop windows.

Appearances and narratives.

Oh definitely. The whole “reasoning” thing was just sending the answer back as a prompt a few times in different structures, and it was of course all billed

The stance is that chatbota aren’t essential to the economy the way smartphones or computers are.

When you send a message to a chatbot, it cuts it up to little pieces made up of a few letters, assigns numbers to them, does math, and gives you back a bunch of other numbers that it translates back to pieces and puts together into a sentence.

You pay for the chatbot by the amount of little pieces in and little pieces out. The little pieces are the tokens.

No, they outlawed it way before, but they didn’t outlaw that of OpenAI that also claimed to hack HuggingFace.

It’s also very convenient to outlaw a product that does not exist as advertised.

And “they were shocked” is not a metric. Compare it to the existing state of the art in a test controlled by a party with no conflict of interest and I’ll believe it happened.

There is a huge conflict of interest with that claim being from the AI industry and the US government, with both being interested in overstating the capabilities of the model.

Also, Romanian college kids used to routinely break into US military webpages in the 90s, so IDK what the novelty is.

Tell me when they cause damage or are prosecuted, until then, it’s just an as, likely exaggerated or straight up false.

Vezető is a common word that is used to construct compound words where it means manager.

Irodavezető means office manager, osztályvezető means department head, but mozdonyvezető means train engineer where mozdony is the train engine.

A regex that can match different usernames I presume.

A regex or regular expression is a language to declare patterns to be matched.

You see that “communis(t|m)”? That’s a simple regex that matches both “communist” and “communism”. You can make one for every pattern imaginable, like a username and every number combination afterwards and so on.

Git is actually very efficient. You need to be very inefficient with your workflows to cause strain on a git server.

The fact that you can just host a git server for free and most people don’t need to ever worry about limits is a wonder.

I guess if you can find the worst offenders you can ease server load, like if they make pushes around the clock too fast, that’s one good signal.

Like if you have 2000 pushes in a day (pushes, not commits) and it’s clearly 24/7, that’s probably an autoslopper.

If someone is not doing that, who cares, the “agents directing agents” folks are the ones that cause the most problems.

You can get high accuracy if you don’t care about false negatives and only ban the most egregious shit.

At a 100% risk, it better, or it’s useless.