Gotcha so you’re not disagreeing with any of the points I actually made about how AI can help individualize learning. Just that kids shouldn’t be on computers or tablets in school.
Well, I don’t have anything to say about that as my kid has a chromebook and outside or using it for certain homework assignments, I don’t think he uses it to learn. If he had some AI software on there designed for him to learn, I bet he’d get much more use out of it.
Not sure what your point is as my comment is about students and learning from AI. Not about tablets and laptops.
If internet searching and self learning matches you learning style, great for you.
Personally, I have used AI for many development projects and have learned way more than I was ever able to by googling. Many times I’d take answers from stack exchange and ask AI wtf it meant and it would break it down in a way I could understand.
Now apply this to middle school math and a student that just doesn’t learn math like other kids.
TBD. I’m no fan of AI or especially the companies. But every kid learns differently and our schools are not built for some kids’ learning styles. AI can customize for every single student.
I feel like the ones that could benefit most from AI teachers are the ones in these huge classroom where the teachers can’t give individual help. And AI would be perfect for these grades as the topics are much more basic and easier for AI to get right.
Anyway, I don’t think this’ll be a popular comment, but I also don’t think it’s wrong.
Cinnamon spaghetti with chili on it.
Also for when you want your cereal wet, but not too wet.
Fake flock heal hero.
Is the first guy telling a joke?
They should get that dog from good boy. Terrible movie, but the dog was great.
Point being that the SEO was forced onto the websites to make their websites a worse experience. Now they summarize the website so you don’t have to view that website anymore.
I don’t know, Google controls the board and all the rules. The SEO people are just the players trying to play by those rules.
I find it interesting how people have to change their website content so Google will notice them and give them preferential treatment. Like those cooking websites where they have to tell their life story before giving the recipe.
Google is responsible for the bloat on the website, but also just stealing their content in the summary.
Bonus points if they can hop up onto the back of a chair.
But, isn’t this just a demonstration that Cara isn’t doing what it’s built for? If one person, who is honest about what they did, is able to scrape all the art for $10, wouldn’t the major AI companies also be able to scrape it?
And not only would they not be honest about it, it seemed like this went completely unnoticed by Cara.
Everybody that votes democrat is a “Criminal” according to this guy.
I wonder if there’s something that can be done. Sure the company may be out of business, but their hard drives somewhere that still has the data on it, right?
The hair is more interesting than the sand.
There’s a difference between handing kids chat gpt and telling them to learn and giving them ai tools designed around teaching children specific topics.
My kid has to do math problems on a website each week. When he doesn’t understand the problem he can click a help button that breaks the problem down for him. When he doesn’t understand that, he’ll ask his teacher who doesn’t have time to break things down even further for him or loses patience with him when he still doesn’t get it. So he goes on without understanding. A built in AI could easily figure out what it is he doesn’t understand and then teach him that and work back to the problem he’s working on.
I think the “wait a year” approach is probably a good one to ensure they are giving the kids the right kind of AI. But a blanket “AI bad” statement I disagree with. I think kids that have access to these kinds of tools will end up better off than those without.