They couldn’t even control Iran’s access. Gaza was the most surveilled place on Earth, and the Al-Aqsa Flood still happened.

There are limitations to what they can actually do, even with all their power. Stop doomering, people who have much harder lives than you do have found ways to fight back. You’re just making excuses.

They’re ramping up compute capacity because it’s their only advantage over small developers and other countries, not because it actually works. China has demonstrated that smaller, cheaper, purpose built LLMs are more sustainable than trying to make LLMs into AGI. The bubbly obsession with building more data centers is driven more by hype than by material reality.

The guillotine of the future will have an onboard purpose built AI to guide it to find heads to chop.

Yet in the real world, it isn’t the wealthiest and most powerful nations that are using drone swarms. They’re still stuck in the past.

Which tells me that militarized robots are going to be used by more than only wealthy and powerful people/nations.

Did you forget about the white South African genocide bullshit?

Grok has been modified to produce results that Musk likes.

Except the bosses are AI brained too and they don’t value actually knowing how to do things.

It goes deeper than that.

AI replaces entry level workers, but AI is less productive than even moderately experienced workers, so it actively harms whatever firms utilize it because they don’t have entry level workers to become experienced. It’s entirely parasitic. AI isn’t good at its job, it’s merely good enough. Replace enough of the economy with “good enough” and suddenly it isn’t good enough anymore.

It’s like a diary that always affirms everything and never disagrees with you and enables all of your worst attributes!

They’re actually very similar weights.

AI is trained on film reviews, which means it’s just going to regurgitate stuff that critics and posters have said about films.

Chances are, AI will tend to produce opinions that people agree with, because it’s just regurgitating our opinions back to us.

It’s worse, because pollsters at least go out and solicit opinions from people who might not otherwise express their opinions.

An LLM is collecting opinions from people who happily and freely share their opinions without even being prompted, and completely ignoring people who don’t post their opinion. No attempt is made to account for the people who don’t post opinions because no one reaches out to them, they’re invisible. I don’t think there’s even a way to account for this, it’s just inherently busted.

The “average” they’re finding is an average of the training set. That can’t actually apply to public opinion polls because the data in the set is going to be biased towards people that express their opinions. There’s already polling bias towards people who are likely to answer polling questions, now imagine that bias being applied to the loudest, most opinionated, most prolific posters.

There are going to be people who believe this disease is real for the rest of their lives.

You think they’ll just smile and nod when Target steals their money?

I think Target stores will have to start hiring armed security.

Go back to Reddit.

It’s not really hopeful. They’re gonna learn the hard way.

They’ll learn when future consequences become current consequences.

They’ll learn.

Proprietary software developers are sabotaging their open source competition, why doesn’t that make sense to you?

They hide it because they’re saboteurs and are intentionally ruining open source projects to protect their own market share. If every open source project is ruined by slop, there will be no choice but to use closed source proprietary software. They’re the enemy.