I don’t really see the point of this. It’s just adding complexity for the sake of it. As far as I can tell when you change gear it just changes some software parameters, there are no physical gears. Yet there’s a clutch and the ability to stall?

  • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still makes sense for the sports cars. But very few people on the planet want a manual EV daily. This will fail on commuter cars.

    • noride@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since it’s all software, it would surprise me if it can’t just be disabled when you’re not in the mood for fun. I think that will make it a bit more appealing to the masses.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t tho. An automatic can outshift a human anytime. For purists, they put in paddles.

      • DudeBoy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being able to choose when to shift is often more important than how quickly you shift. Paddle shifters require expensive transmissions or some software trickery.

      • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        At normal speeds gears do not make sense for a daily. At track speeds you’ll find most EVs, outside the 600+ bhp type models hit their top end. Having a second and third gear is helpful for that. Not shift speed.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Manual makes sense for people who are used to manuals. Like 95% of Europe. Driving an automatic is boring to me for example.

        • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          1. they aren’t
          2. most teams are using a sequential which is basically an auto with flappy paddles or a up down lever. You ain’t using a clutch except to get into first.
          3. because it’s a driving aid and people don’t like that shit. ABS is about the only aids people accept.

          I don’t care if you’re fucking max verstappen, you ain’t shifting faster than a Porsche or Ferrari DCT.

        • Fetus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No drag racer ever used a powerglide? And would you really consider F1 cars to be manual?

    • DudeBoy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It makes no sense for EV sports cars. Manuals on ICE cars make sense because being able to chose exactly when the car shifts is important and because sequential shift and dual clutch transmissions are extremely expensive.

        • DudeBoy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How so? Would you mind explaining your reasoning because I honestly can’t think of a good reason to put fake stick shifts in EVs. From my point of view it’s the automotive equivalent of putting subway suffers clips on the bottom half of a tiktok.