• qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What’s the conventional wisdom as to why this is so bad, but eating meat basically gets a pass? Like, meat offers sustenance, yes, but it’s by no means required. So basically, humans eat meat because it tastes really good — it’s great “culinary entertainment.”

    This is a different kind of entertainment, but it’s deeply offensive to many folks. I’m not trying to be a dick about it, just curious why this is seen as such a sin.

    Is it that these animals weren’t “supposed” to be killed? Would a movie about a beef cow who ends up getting slaughtered, both onscreen and IRL, be seen as better? Worse?

    • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I think because of

      1.the chasm between the intended discourse of the film (feelgood movie with puppies going on adventures) and the alleged means to film it, feels particularly cynical and dishonest

      2.the fact that dogs are companions -they have co-evolved next to humans for about 15 thousand years and hold a special place, contrary to animals typically consumed for their flesh

    • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      are you for real comparing this to eating meat?

      Like we artificially breed cows into existence for meat and milk alone, dogs exists as companions, how could possibly be the same?.

    • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      fair point but killing for entertainment is pure evil. Killing cause you have to eat is neccesary evil.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You have to eat, but you don’t have to eat meat. It’s just as optional as creating art that involves animal abuse. (Not a vegan, just interested in this topic).

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 minutes ago

          My sis had to loosen her vegetarian standards for the sake of her daughters health.

          We are omnivores, accept that fact. While you can survive without flesh (and the modern person eats too much of it), it requires personal effort and research to find substitutes, with the risk of damaging your health. And most just prefer some meat or fish now and then.

          Btw, almost all herbivores are opportunistic omnivores, because they can’t research substitutes. Even sheep eat chicks, there, i said it.

        • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Humans need nutrition and vitamins found in meat. Without them they get health issues or die. When lab grown meats are available, real meats become optional.

            • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              6 hours ago

              There’s multiples more of omnivores who don’t have health issues either.

                  • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    6 hours ago

                    You say:

                    Humans need nutrition and vitamins found in meat. Without them they get health issues or die.

                    I reply that billions of vegetarians exist without health issues, proving that humans don’t need nutrition and vitamins found in meat.

                    You reply that many omnivores exist without issues as well, which is a non-sequitur. Why was that your reply?

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            We need things that can be found in meat. With some effort, you can obtain them from alternative sources.

            • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Yes.

              “with some effort”. Eating food humans are meant to eat in a balanced and healthy manner is already borderline impossible for everyone. Eating only vegetarian is more akin to a full time hobby than what food is to most people: fuel.

              People don’t even give a shit about cars that they drive around and spend insane amount of money on each decade. I just don’t see most people just switching to vegetarianism without a survival need. Plant based foods are just stupid expensive to boot outside of rice and potatoes.

              • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                Yeah, it’s harder for sure. But what I’m saying is that not everyone needs to kill to eat-- if you can afford it and have some time to plan meals, it isn’t a “necessary evil”. I’d argue it’s still more moral to kill for food than for entertainment, of course.

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Wow, I must be doing it wrong then. I learned basic combinations and a variety of recipes. No different from when I learned to cook with meat.

                I’m not saying that it’s for everyone. I personally still eat fish from time to time. But it definitely isnt a full time hobby

                • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Yea, it’s easier than some people try to say it is. It’s a matter of habit and produce availability, which varies depending on your location

          • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            No, that’s a myth. There is actually no need for consuming animals. We owe the perpetuation of this myth by the meat industry

    • SirActionSack@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Broadly, people are not ok with animals being mistreated. An animal that is raised in safe, comfortable conditions and then killed painlessly is not mistreated by the standards of many people.

      Abusing a puppy and kitten to make a film is absolutely mistreatment, hence the different reaction.

      I’m not trying to be a dick about it

      Doubt. “Just asking questions” is so often a deliberate dick move.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I assume that “No animal were harmed” claim cannot be used in film where real meat are consumed?

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I suppose if I had a cow living in my home with me that would be a problem. It’s familiarity.

      And puppies