• TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    It was never about Scooby Doo. IIRC, this was supposed to be an original show, but latching it to a successful 90s franchise must have looked like a sure money maker.

    Edit: did some fact checking, this was a theory. The show actually was an unfortunate reimagining of Scooby Doo since its inception.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Regardless of what the official story is, that’s probably what really happened. Same thing with the Halo tv show.

      • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t know. Seeing how modern shows like Foundation, The Witcher, or Star Trek Discovery, to name a few, have gratuitously walked over their own canon, I can understand how the producers thought Velma was a good idea for a new Scooby Doo show.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I think Discovery is a little different. They had way too many producers and writers on that show, all trying to get their little ideas in so when they moved onto a new project, they could get a sexy “By the creators of Star Trek” tagline on it. The situation Walter Mosley described when he left STD made the writer’s room sound like a viper pit.

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Plus the first two seasons basically had the producers get fired, and a new person brought in.

            That would be bad for any show.