• DarkThoughts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    The game is a solid 7 and still holds immense potential. The lack of updates combined with a lot of quest & progression breaking bugs and dismissal of such criticism is a 0 and why I wrote a negative review.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think Fallout 4 was a solid 7. Starfield seems to have been aiming for F4 in space but it falls short in just about every arena. I remember the settlement feature being really cool but unfortunately not very well integrated into the game, and a little half baked. I was so hype to see Starfield would be bringing it back, but instead it was entirely pointless and a total waste of time, as well as being far more restrictive.

      The main quest in F4 was at least relatable and interesting enough with some very nice side quests. Starfield has the most boring narrative of every game I’ve ever played, the mind brainless go-hum fetch quest side quests, and no interesting characters in sight. It was literally the 7/10 Fallout 4 but somehow worse.

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      A solid 7? I’d give it a 4-5. I very stupidly preordered and I very much regret it. The one and only time I ever did so as well. The game shows a shocking lack of care. It definitely has some systems which ought to be interesting but they’re rendered pointless by the game and the main plot is utterly appalling.

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      11 months ago

      Solid 7 out of what? If you say out of 100, then yes I agree drinking diarrhea water out of a toilet bowl is more fun to do than playing that shit. If you say out of 10 then you are claiming it’s well above average (5) which means you have been drinking diarrhea water.

      • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Considering how you verbalize yourself I think we both know who’s drinking diarrhea, and likely undiluted.

        And if you lack so much nuance you might as well go back to Reddit btw.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I gotta stand behind that guy and say if this game is a seven, you’ve really been playing some terrible games.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Opinions can’t be wrong.

            But his is equally as valuable as the people loving the game.

            • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              My 7 isn’t loving the game. It’s an above average “good” rating. I don’t think I’ve even played a game that I would rate 7 out of 100 because they’d be so obviously bad that I wouldn’t even buy them in the first place. For me, 5 out of 10 is already “bad” and everything below that is just varying degrees of trash.

        • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          11 months ago

          I was simply joking, but it seems I don’t need to since you seem to be the life of the party. And no, I’ll stay here and continue writing with vulgarity instead of going to Reddit, go fuck yourself.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            When I rate a movie 7/10, I’m saying it’s a great movie that’s DEFINITELY worth a watch. Some of my favorite movies are 6/10.

            When these people rate a shit game 7/10, they mean “it needs improvement.”

            If Starfield was a movie, it’d be rated as a 4-5/10. It’s okay. It’s fine, but it’s not revolutionary. It’s mediocre at best. That’s a five. It’s worse than The Outer Worlds, which is maybe a six.

            Please stay here with your vulgarity, you’re the reasonable one here.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            “I was joking”, “go fuck yourself”. Yeah, clearly, with such thin skin.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Ok, but by your own measure, youre the thin skinned cock. See? You said a big boy word when I told you that you were an idiot, so now that magically makes you thin skinned by childrens playground rules.