They really want us to love cars. But why would we love being car dependent?

Dependency is never freedom. Mobility freedom comes from mobility choices.

Via Urban Truth Collective: https://www.urbantruthcollective.com/

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    The argument to this is going to be “but I own my own car,” followed by either “I can come and go as I like” or "public transportation isn’t very good in my area (or nonexistent).

    So then you would say that your car is yours until it breaks down, then you’re at the mercy of a shop. Some people can do the work on their own, but gearheads are kind of a dying breed, and also newer cars are designed to fail sooner. The idea of a car that will go for a million miles is decades past, and even those were exceptions, not the rule. Cars cost more to own than ever. Car prices/payments are going up, quality is going down, repair prices are going up, and quantity/availability of parts are going down. The solution to all of this is socialised public transportation. Maybe you pay a little bit to ride, maybe you have to wait a couple minutes at a bus stop, but you aren’t responsible when the thing breaks down, the city/community has a fleet and a deal to get parts and repair them and keep most of them operational. So it really reduces a lot of the friction in getting one back on the road. It also creates jobs — drivers, and fleet maintenance.

    Of course, Uber and Lyft exist, but they are prohibitively expensive for all but the Uber rich to use regularly. And they come with their own set of problems.

    • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Even ignoring that most people couldn’t maintain their cars for shit; people always seem to forget that they’re still super dependent on petrol and the oil industry. How is that in any way better than relying on governments to provide public transit?

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        My favourite is the preppers with the massive gas guzzling truck and relying on disiel farm equipment. Like sure in theory you could make it run on ethanol or organic oils, but you’d be better off making it that way before SHTF.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      No. The argument is that, if you don’t already have alternative infrastructure, you are not free without a car (in most of the US). You often can’t even work.

      • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I actually looked into public transportation because of this thread. My city operates a bus service, but doesn’t come to my part of town. I don’t live in a bad part of town. They just… don’t come this way. I’d have to walk something like 3 miles to get to the nearest bus station.

        I feel like they did the bare minimum to say they did something, maybe for tax purposes?

        I’m not too mad. I have a car. But now I know not having one is less of an option (and the bus doesn’t get within 30 miles of my job, so yeah, I need my car to get to work).

  • persona_non_gravitas@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I like being free to cheap out on transportation and then be able to splurge elsewhere (in my case, fancy tea and opera).

    Someone else of my income would prefer the convenience and cost of their own car, and then skip the other luxuries.

    Either way, having the option = more freedom.