…dont read the comments…dont read the comments…dont read the comments…dont read the comments…ahh fuck I read the comments

  • theplanlessman@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve found it interesting how many more pro-car and anti-bike people their are in the lemmy version of fuckcars compared to the Reddit one.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could post future stuff like op in any of the bike/bicycling/cycling communities here on lemmy, more likely to facilitate a varied but constructive discussion

        Occasional comments I see on fuckcars make me think the commenter would park their car beside their bed if they could 😳… fuckcars to me means an end to car dependency, not “i love my car so much I would put an oil checker down the exhaust pipe”

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Context: The bikes broke the speed limit going down a steep hill

    https://nitter.net/JeremyVineOn5/status/1699682955629572251

    None of them have been on a bike and it shows lol.

    IMO going downhill is pretty much the only situation in which a a bike rider can actually break a speed limit on a public road. Try on a flat road and your legs will start going all disco inferno on you after a while, especially in a city with constant start/stop traffic

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why so?

          From my perspective, it takes a lot of effort to sustain 15 mph, much less even 20. Ebikes stop assisting you at 15 anyway, the ones that go beyond that or have a throttle button are illegal in most places outside the US.

          Speed limits are counterintuitive in most cases, people tend to see them as a speed target rather than a speed limit. It could have a side effect of encouraging unsafe riding, especially if they’re matching their speed with cars they could end up staying in vehicles’ blind spots, being blocked by the A pillar, etc, leading to very serious accidents.

          Unlike cars with powerful engines, people on bikes have varying fitness levels. Expecting 120kg Bob to sustain the same speed as 65kg Mary (which would implied by a speed “limit”) would just end up with more traffic as less fit riders forego their bikes for their car instead.

          I see no speed limit as encouraging riders to go at their own pace, without feeling any pressure

          • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve seen speed limits on multiuse trails in Canada.

            In this case, I believe the limit is less about actual speed, and more to remind cyclists that the path isn’t solely a cyclepath. This is supported by the sign having a bigger “shared path” image than speed limit image.

            These shared paths are limited to 20kph, but never enforced.

          • Carter@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The same reason speed limits exist for cars: safety. A bike crashing into a pedestrian at 30mph is still going to cause a lot of damage.

            • theplanlessman@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Indeed, 30mph is far too fast for anything to be travelling in a built up area. That’s why I support 20mph zones.