Also, how can you be aged 16 and below? I know, not technically the software’s fault, but still…

  • dave@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your child can’t be both 16 and below. It’s understandable but wrong. If they’d written it in the form “All children 16 and below …” it would have been ok.

    But still, how do you answer it for a 17-year-old?

    • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      “16 and below” is a completely normal phrasing.

      I’m only concerned about no option being there for, you know, kids above 16 :D