I actually robot-fed my kitten from day one, so they basically don’t associate me with food at all, just with cuddles and reprimands.
- 0 Posts
- 32 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 13th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Thank God for double blind peer reviews, warts and all.
That looks like text photoshopped on a blank shirt, especially with how flat the text is.
5·5 months agoI can say with confidence that at least some call it homocide map, with the evidence you’ve provided. 🧐
Reminds me of this work by Latour. It goes into the tremendous amount of oftentimes political labor that goes into the establishment of new scientific knowledge as paradigmatic:
28·5 months agoAlso one of the dumbest names ever.
This assumes that the aorta cannot be deformed by the school bus. Cooked penne can be destroyed by a six sided die.
Conversely, social scientists tend to compete on how to underdress the most.
And cats. They were a menace.
Huh? Wikipedia isn’t banned in Russia yet. Though I do expect them to take steps towards it.
Exactly, in honor of Jimmy Neutron.
What is this low grade garbage? GPT-4 Turbo is old, this is just an update of it. Happens from time to time. This one is supposed to be a bit better than previous interactions of GPT-4 Turbo.
Really makes you think.
An ice cube being lifted by a geyser.
Could also be a sign without text.
3.5 or GPT-4? I can run the latter if need be.
That’s one way of putty it.
In my field it’s often general journal policy, not an individual choice. It’s hit or miss, as it can be easy to guess who the reviewer or author is in a niche field. I personally don’t go out of my way to figure out the author’s affiliation, even if it can be trivial. Regarding self citations, those are usually obfuscated at the review stage. I’d say that a paper is easy to narrow down to a circle of scholars, but it might be the first paper of a research associate, a throwaway paper by a PI, or a paper that aims to engage those narrow specialists. So is a kind of smoke screen.