No Claude? It’s pretty good in my experience, and I follow someone on twitter who does absolutely wild things with it.
No Claude? It’s pretty good in my experience, and I follow someone on twitter who does absolutely wild things with it.
The unnecessary and confusing functions are horrible, yes, but I’d still say that the fact that they’re wrong is the “worst” part.
The word “prompt” is used correctly here:
My college workflow was to copy the prompt and then “paste without formatting” in Word and leave that copy of the prompt at the top while I worked, I would absolutely have fallen for this. :P
That’s the comment you originally responded to. It’s two sentences (with a comma splice) and very clearly has nothing to do with AI.
Misreading this and misunderstanding it, as simple as it is, is embarrassing but understandable. Commenting “I hope you lose your degree” because you can’t read 28 words of text without drawing completely the wrong conclusion is, again, embarrassing, but not dire.
Arguing in multiple comment threads about it, while your misunderstanding is repeatedly and clearly explained to you, and then saying you “stand by” all of this, makes it clear that you are a complete idiot.
Do you mean that you think a student not using an AI might do that by accident? Otherwise I’m not sure how it’s relevant that there might be a real person with that name.
Holy shit, “prompt” is not primarily an AI word. I get not reading an entire article or essay before commenting, but maybe you should read an entire couple of sentences before making a complete ass of yourself for multiple comments in a row. If you can’t manage that, just say nothing! It’s that easy!
Wot? They didn’t say they cheated, they said they kept a copy of the prompt at the top of their document while working.
Presumably the teacher knows which students would need that, and accounts for it.
…whose published work on the essay’s subject you can cite?
I think this is asking about where to keep projects, not how to organize them internally.