Brummbaer

Also in some countries plaster comes with antifungal substances mixed in by default.

Octopi are truly the next in line to develop civilization, they already got sexual harassment down.

Yeah, that’s Calvinism.

Try to be successful at all costs so you have proof that god loves you. A message that is really compatible with Capitalism.

PS: I just understood that you asked about the definition.

Basically a reform / protestant roman Catholic theology inspired by Martin Luther founded by John Calvin.

Of course.

Personally I have given up on that. I try to either use false information when they don’t need the real data or throwaway" emails and SEPA and one time credit card numbers for banking stuff.

I don’t trust any company with my data ever, so I’m constantly paranoid in a way.

A short and maybe wrong summary. If you succeed in life Jesus loves you and if you fail it was your fault for not trying hard enough.

The Chinese can do less harm with my data than the US and it’s allies.

Just wait, they will ban all Greco-Roman texts next.

I’m speaking about the firmware and other blobs that are there because devices wouldn’t work without it.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/WHENCE

Nice, something running in an eBPF context with a blob in the middle, what could go wrong …

Also there are already a lot of binary blobs in the kernel, that also makes me nervous a bit.

I don’t understand why they are signing it. I mean we know that Microsoft is hostile, why submit to their signing bullshit.

The more you normalise bad behaviour the worse it gets.

What are you using to ship the logs to VL?

If you want to exclude “normal” logs you should start excluding them before they reach VL, so the only logs you have are the interesting ones.

The more you can filter and label at the source, the less you have to work out in VL.

I use alloy (which is kinda heavy) to extract and prepare only the data I want and it works great so far.

I mean you could have the best car free cycling infrastructure in the world and it would still be better to wear helmets since the energy you build up with a bike is just too much for your crane to take.

This is the same reason airbags exist and we stopped putting metal spikes on steering wheels.

All of this is strangely reminiscent of the seatbelt discussion for me.

Don’t give me hope.

I still don’t get it, we know helmets protect, so the less cranial trauma you come across in your life the longer your life will be. It’s rather simple.

What you are addressing here is just anti bike politics. If tomorrow everyone would agree to wear helmets, they would come up with speed restrictions for cycling. The goal is to be anti cycling. The idea they hide behind is replaceable.

I didn’t know there was a anti bicycle-helmet faction. I guess it’s like smoking, if I ignore the dangers it won’t happen to me…

Just put it on the light side if the moon - problem solved.

I’m not sure if the people living in Paris were mad. It might be the people who commute that hated her anti-car politics.

On the other hand we are talking about a nation that wanted to put a highway interchange in the middle of Paris …

It’s some kind of click-farming. That’s a negative knowledge article, you feel less informed after reading it.

Thanks for the replies - going to check that out when I have time.