Corruption is nominally illegal under most Western systems although economics does favour those with the money for their legal defense.

what i meaning is more like, lets say you give some place money for some public service, like public transport. And then the guy who implements this service/ leads the service/ is responsible for it, takes half the money for themself and the uses only the rest for the service -> corruption In capitalism and privatisation, a private company has to do it, and like some percentage of the money goes into the pockets of the owners -> appearently fine

sry writing this i think this might not be what corruption means as word, but maybe more like embezzelment? not sure

capitalism basically is just making corruption legal and acceptable and acting like anyone could become the next person profiting from it.

while the non-capitalism examples are like alomst very autharian regimes, in which it was never really like that stuff is owned by the workers and all that, but that they were working for basically whoever was in power/ held positions of power.

(and to be fair it (capitalism) made planning easier, since all of this happend in a time without the information technology of today)

or atleast that is how i see it, but it i have no deep education in this so i can be wrong

i mean like company espionage and similar threats than leaked user data…

i would even more say with anonymity, considering the chats are still private and the main use case for messanger apps is to communicate with people who know who you are

peek rage bait

where are the companys lobbying against this btw?? i mean it is their data they will be leaked aswell

I think maybe a good comparison is to written papers/ assignments. It can generate those just like it can generate code.

But it is not about the words themself, but about the content.

would you deploy this server?

i feel like that half of them did not even reply is like kind of really bad and if feels like these werent like real listings to begin with? I dont know but it feels and sounds incredible rude and unprofessional to not reply to all applications. Exspecially since it should just be an automated process, so it feels fishy when companies dont even do that.

not really sure what the argument is here, this is a problem about manufactures not publishing their source code for their drrivers and firmware,

having another linux based mobile os would do nothing to solve this issue.

furthermore i doubt grapheneOs would describe their kernel as closed source

Android is already the linux phone. It already exist, there is no need to recreate something that exist, it is much easier and more efficient to improve an already working base project.

It annoys me so much that they have convinced anyone that this stuff is for protecting against piracy of something like that, while this is just another tool for them to force you into using their platform and ecosystem. It does nothing against piracy.