Yep, I don’t see any problem with the headline. Seems like sensible advice.

deleted by creator

I guess I’m used to it. Besides, imagine not using a cable at all–even better?

You can still do that with an adapter though?

Indeed, I don’t really see the problem. Instead of a single use port you have a practically universal port. That’s better, surely.

Thought it would be Cuomo. It wasn’t Cuomo. I mean it’s also Cuomo though.

Oh, fair enough then

Why are your earbuds… in your pants

This is how you juice GDP.

It’s called dog-slopping

Yes! Punish them with my unwelcome presence.

Exactly. Rude cunt on the morning express? Hold my latte.

Could start with a guillotine for corporations and see how that goes.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/torproject-snowflake/

✨HANDSOME✨

Flash! A-ahhhhh!

slow & happy > fast & furious

I’ve gone the other way. I used to run a Proxmox cluster, then someone gave me a Synology NAS. Now it’s rare that I spin up Proxmox and instead use a mix of VMs, containers and Synology/Synocommunity apps.

Sure, you can do that at an aggregate level, but then how do you divide it by customer? And even then, some setups will be more efficient than others, so you’d only get that setup’s usage.

And even if you do that and can narrow it down to a single user and a single prompt, you can still only roughly predict how long it will think and how long the response will be.

All my music is stored in a folder on my NAS, broken down by artist, release. It can be accessed via SMB, SFTP, Jellyfin and Plex. From there I stream to what ever device I’m using. Wireguard, Tailscale or Plex is required to stream outside my home. Navidrome sounds interesting.