Nobel had his brother exploded by the nitroglycerine formula he created, so for certain disgustingly wealthy folks, it really do be just ‘a random person dies’ matter.

EDIT: sorry, not one of Nobel’s later formulations, it was actually just straight nitroglycerine. Alfred Nobel would later stabilize it with diatomaceous earth and then, much later, with cotton.

It’s a heuristic that says ‘most often the simplest solution is the best solution’. It’s supposed to be used to shorten the path of finding a viable solution to a question or problem.

Basically, you find the simplest possible solutions, the ones with the fewest variables to account for, and you test them. They usually take the least amount of time to test, and they usually yield a solution faster because of that.

This heuristic is often misused by concluding that very simple answers are immediately correct without actually verifying. Its best application is for selecting possible solutions to test only.

Quite a few of the photos taken are shot around the base of oil rigs, so we do actually have a scale for some of them.

Additionally, if an AI is advertised as ‘safe for medical guidance’, that should open that AI company to lawsuits.

I’m a huge fan of Kid A, though I can also accept that experimental music isn’t everyone’s bag.

Thom Yorke had something of a mental break and made Kid A, which was fueled by a feeling that rock ‘was dead’, just a formulaic and commodified product now.

I still like Creep, it’s a great-sounding song. I do get why they don’t like it, based on their statements about why they want to leave it behind.

Yorke told Rolling Stone in 1993: “It’s like it’s not our song any more … It feels like we’re doing a cover.”[13] During Radiohead’s first American tour, audience members would scream for “Creep”, then leave after it was performed.[7] Yorke said the success “gagged” them and almost caused them to break up; they felt they were being judged on a single song.

You’re transgression has been noted. The gruvbox police will be over to collect four shortly for light theme crimes. /j

I’ll be honest I don’t even know vhat gruvbox is.

A man is called a pedophile. Said man then shoots someone in his near visibility. He has not distracted you from him being a pedophile, he’s just now a pedophile and an active shooter.

We should care about both these issues. Trump is a pedophile and a close friend of epsein. He is also wasting human life for a distraction and should be shamed for that as well.

We talkin about this fella? https://spec-evo.fandom.com/wiki/Pterodeers

The vast standard is music ships with the artist’s name baked into the metadata. It’s watermarked that way, kept in the fringes of the data, away from the main piece, just like a signature on the fringes of the artpiece. This is not new, nearly every artist does it. That’s often why we can ID physical art centuries later, and it’s why you rarely ever stumble into a song file you can’t identify the artist of.

States have governors, towns have mayors, and in anarchist theory none of those heirarchal positions would exist. Usually, heirarchies are formed in order to complete projects and those heirarchies are supposed to disappear once the project is complete. Can’t really have a state without a legislative body dictating it.

‘Basically no one in charge’ is not exactly correct. Heirarchies are allowed to exist, but ideally should be as brief and flat as possible.

My best understanding of the end-goal is an intermeshing alliance of small democratic collectives working together to provide for one another. This type of system has existed previously, such as with the various tribes across the Americas which often traded and collaborated with one another. In contrast with previous times, there is vastly more understanding of how the world works now, and thus many more possible projects to strive towards.

There is also no expectation of some supposed utopia from this, as i understand - conflicts are still expected to flair up every now and again. The main aim is for equality and the absence of a single constant power structure which oppresses and dictates the conditions of all, but instead that there is a democratic collaberation defining the conditions for folks involved.

As a straight man, i concur.

One method is writing the text in black, copy-pasting it, then taking copy down a font size and change its color. I am also pretty sure there’s a button click to add an outline.

That’s why it’s pascal’s mugging. You’re getting screwed for something that, statistically speaking, is a shot in the dark.

I have yet to meet a woman I’m close enough friends with who doesn’t have a personal sexual assault story. Not a harrassment story, an SA story. Could just be bad luck but i don’t think it is. It also lines right up with the statistic that 3/4 women get sexually assaulted before 30 (that stat is from memory, but I’ll try and track it down in a bit.)

I believe It is much worse than you think.

EDIT: so on the stat I popped: NSVRC says 1 in 5 women in their lifetimes and RAINN says 1 in 6 in their lifetime. It’s been a while since i’d read that stat so it makes sense it’d be off.(though it is disappointing just how far off it ended up being, big whiff on my part) Those stat pages also have numbers for men as well

Have a fallback system that informs the user that there are no woman drivers and that it will be choosing a man driver because of that, most likely I think.

Well, that’s because TERFs are posers that don’t know any of radical feminism’s actual theory.

It’s kind of like how anarchocapitalists call themselves ‘libertarians’. They are entirely just muddying the waters either out of sheer ignorance or active malice.

I think you need to read up more on what radical feminism is. It is more down the rabbit hole than you’re describing.

It’s not the flipping of society to place women in men’s roles. it’s the eventual elimination of man-woman destinction entirely. Their end goal is for genitals to eventually not matter culturally. They attack ‘The Patriarchy’ because it is the current cultural zeitgeist that must be dismantled to make way for this liberated non-binary society they envision.

So, how likely is it that neanderthals and humans just lived in tribes together, and neanderthals just eventually died off within human tribes?

What is p-fracking, and how does it differ from regular fracking? Or is this post just asserting the definition?