Nah, the Fediverse is based on freedom of association while most people live in countries they were born in and leaving one is really hard in most cases. Not to mention that ‘self-hosting’ a state just for yourself would be considered an extremism by existing states.
The Fediverse is clearly a libertarian idea.
an even better thing would be to put more emphasis on user controlled blocks.
And force your instance maintainers to deal with the amount of bigoted content they won’t be able to moderate? There’s already a huge amount of stuff any other instance would be blocked with no hesitation.
Reminds me of this comment by one of the Lemmy devs: https://lemmy.ml/comment/6744852
Technology won’t save us if we allow unethical companies to mess with us.
Can you please provide a link to a post with a blocked image?
Did you reload the page?
You probably need to enable “I’m an advanced user” in the settings.
There’s a box to the right of domain names (the box with + and -), you can click on a left side of it to allow and on a right side to forbid it.
That’s not an imageboard, we want actually civil discussion here.
npc attestation user gay
We don’t do that here
I don’t know what Lemmy is.
Lemmy is a Fediverse software for community-based discussion, something similar to reddit.
When you tag Lemmy communities via Mastodon, you submit your toot to respective community as a post. That’s why people are a bit confused here.
Also, first line on your post transforms to a title on lemmy, and it looks like this: “Sur [#iOS](https://mastodon.social/tags/iOS), le navigateur [#chrome](https://mastodon.social/tags/chrome) de [#google](https://mastodon.social/tags/google) va maintenant permettre d'avoir la barre d’”. Lemmy doesn’t use formatting for titles.
maybe that’s why Mozilla stuck with the design that works?
My guess would be they’re just afraid to change something at this point, considering the reception of their previous redesign.
They mostly follow Chrome UI nowadays, so I doubt we’ll see any innovation from them in the UI field.
i was on gnome for a year before switching to sway, so I guess that’s the reason of it being looking up like gnome.
Makes sense.
As u want tabs to under address bar, it can be achieved, if you are interested I can try to implement it.
While I don’t propose Vivaldi, I must admit the way they’re implementing UI/UX for tabs is the right one. They have optional tab bar and grouped vertical tabs in a sidebar (which is also optional). I think Mozilla should learn some tricks from Vivaldi in that respective.
I actually use it a lot, and I anyway use desktops with window decorations only. But, from the perspective of an average FF user, I think the inability to just drag your window will be a dealbreaker. I’m also not a fan of software that forces you to certain workflow.
Its not to make it look like something else
Yeah sorry, it looked a bit GNOMEish so I assumed it was related to this desktop.
I hide the CLOSE, MINIMIZE & MAXIMIZE button as i am using Sway
It makes sense for keyboard-driven window managers as well as for DEs with window decorations, but on GNOME for example this design would leave no place to move a window around.
And to move, we can just press the mod button (CMD on macs and window logo button on keyboards) then just press the left mouse click on firefox to move screen.
I use this a lot on Xfce, but most users don’t even know they can do this (and will never bother to change their habits). I prefer when application integrates into environment, not forces some kind of workflow. It’s totally fine for a personal redesign, but as a main UI it’s a bit too much.
Thats why I am saying there are some hiccups here and there and we need implementation directly from developer. Or toggle to move tabs from top to vertical.
I agree, would love to see more customizability on Firefox. I personally prefer tabs to be under toolbar/addressbar, not above it (and to hide when there’s only one tab.
I’m not sure why Firefox must look like a GNOME app by default. IMHO, looks really bad.
Also, how am I supposed to move this window?
I have seen some LW users only wanting to browse their local feed, or not wanting to subscribe to .ml communities.
We shouldn’t centralise Lemmy just because some users treat it as such.
“Yeah, just block every bigot in existance and you will achieve a somewhat good experience”
Spammers also exist, and they can go long ways to avoid blocking by e.g. creating many accounts. There are people out there who could do this just to troll and harass a single user. If you’re fine with blocking every piece of shit there are - good for you. But it doesn’t mean it should be a norm.