I posted your meme to a friend of mine and I’ld ike to relay his response to you:
ah quality memage
I posted your meme to a friend of mine and I’ld ike to relay his response to you:
ah quality memage
That’s what happens around any toilet in a 2km radius when Taco Bell has a major sale.
Oh, you actually believed that story? Whoops. Sorry! It was actually me who ate your Cheetos and downed your Vodka.
It doesn’t. It will require you to reboot for every god-damned line of code that has changed.
Na, nothing. Did an update today. Nothing bad happened at al, Because why would it?
standing on the shoulders of giants.
I really have a hard time deciding if that is the scandal the article makes it out to be (although there is some backpedaling going on). The crucial point is: 8% of the decisions turn out to be wrong or misjudged. The article seems to want us to think that the use of the algorithm is to blame. Yet, is it? Is there evidence that a human would have judged those cases differently? Is there evidence that the algorithm does a worse job than humans? If not, then the article devolves onto blatant fear mongering and the message turns from “algorithm is to blame for deaths” into “algorithm unable to predict the future in 100% of cases”, which of course it can’t…
Shit… I can’t believe that the author let us hanging like this… Stupid cliffhangers!
Wait! You’re telling me that there is supposed to be some cohesion to that word salad?!
Imagine being presented with an aircraft. You bloody well know what it does and you get permission to disassemble the whole thing to your heart’s content. How big of a task do you think it’d still be to be able to work out how the winged metal tube works and why it does what it does when it does it?
Exactly.
Back in the day, when I installed my very first Linux OS, I had a wireless stick from Netgear. Wireless Drivers back then were abysmal, so I had to compile them from source (literally 15 mins after seeing a TTY for the first time). After I had found out how build-dependencies and such worked somehow and ./configure completed successfully for the first time, the script ended with the epic line:
configure done. Now type 'make' and pray
The enemy of my enemy, eh?
glibc 2.36 is all you’ll ever need, okay? Go away with those goddamn backports!
Furthermore, Calvin is well aware that he’s talking nonsense.
Especially with such careless failures. If some employee was tricked through a well-planned social engineering attack, or they used some mega obscure day0 vulnerability, I’d not be happy, but shit happens, I guess. But not sending my phone number when someone just posts some GET command to an API should be a no-brainer…
I don’t. So… uhm… you’re wrong I guess.
Chiropractor at work: Whatever is wrong with you, as long as I get to crack some joints, you will not die of anything, pinky promise!
sadly, no. Anticheat Systems are designed to be paranoid as fuck. So even some readout of the hardware used that WINE handles a tad differently than Windows might trip it.