

Oh me too, they just seem to have very few long term planning leaders these days.
Oh me too, they just seem to have very few long term planning leaders these days.
True, but remember they will just blame it on the previous administration until it’s forgotten.
Why would they do that when they could use the time-honored GOP strategy of blaming it on democrat leadership and immigrants?
Is it apple only? Would love it on my droid if it’s available.
Seems like you can turn it off if you don’t want it though…
I like any sort of rpg that requires you to understand the text so you know what you need doing. Diablo 2 was my way to learning another language, but it’s fairly old now. Maybe something along those lines or that has a good crafting system? I would suggest stuff like Grounded, some of the Elder Scrolls (oblivion just got a remake so that might be nice), project zomboid, etc.
It does get a lot more information and nuance though. Last week tonight only runs once a week. I don’t know that Last Week Tonight cites all of their sources for each episode like Some More News does.
How much can it drop before banks come collecting on his loans?
Definitely proof of Bacchus.
Doesn’t the fact that it’s not from a well known AI dev or company owner indicate that these types of models are becoming prolific and while inferences may never spike, training each one does still cost a good bit of energy for… why? Is it a more efficient solution or is it just a way to allow for more privacy while increasing the number of people running their own models and by extension exacerbating the ai energy problem?
Or did I misread a whole bunch?
Florida already passed a ban that focuses on state owned or leased property like government buildings and state parks in 2023. Those are public restrooms.
Are Trans men allowed in female bathrooms or are they now banned due to being male presenting?
If they are banned, then that is depriving the public of access to public facilities which their taxes pay for and the end result being a violation of their rights.
If they are not banned, then the original intent of the ban is bullshit and clearly a move to target a subset of the population and make public spaces less hospitable, which I would argue violates their civil rights to enjoy public spaces without harassment.
So then why isn’t water wet if there is clearly liquid water touching liquid water?
How many molecules need to be touching to be considered an aggregate?
What is humidity other than the measurement of how saturated the air is with water vapor (or how wet the air is)
Fair enough, heat can’t lose heat. However when it interacts with a substance some of the energy is “lost” in that it transfers to the substance. Unless it is a completely inert material.
Can you hold a unit of heat? Or do you hold a substance that is imbued with heat energy? Seems like a good reason to say the two are not equateable, which was the main point.
Other than that, a specific fields definition of wet does not make the term exclusive to that field. In aquatic science, wet still means something that water is adhering to. Water adheres to itself so water is wet.
Since heat is thermal energy, it can transfer this thermal energy but it loses some due to the second law of thermodynamics. Water doesn’t lose the ability to adhere to other things when it transfers, so the two phenomenon are not really equateable.
Water is cohesive which means yes, it does attach to itself. It’s one of the main reasons capillary action works and your blood flows the way it does.
Liquids don’t have surfaces?
The property of cohesion means that water is touching and adhering to the surface of other water molecules.
It doesn’t change Tom Fitton being a shit, but facts do matter.
I mean, parts fail. I had a new battery shit out on me after a couple of months, despite keeping up with regular maintenance. Everyone in this thread is running with completely unverified ideas about why the event happened the way it did, with no supporting evidence and then lashing out at others for disagreeing. Y’all all trying to verify your biases.