Rioting Pacifist

Smells like antitrust violations.

2^78 is large but computers can do an awful lot per second, so if only about some the pages contain attachments 2^40-55 is something you could bruteforce in weeks if you can do millions of attempts a second

What is securing those private channels?

Whatever vulnerability there is in that will basically give them root on your home sever right?

How big is N though?

Ships already sailed but shouldn’t AI generated things just be considered derivative of their training set?

I don’t know how that works for images/video, but for code that means if it’s trained on GPL code the resulting code would have to be GPL and the liability is on the people distiributing AI generated code.

This also makes commerical use of AI generated anything complicated while allowing personal use under the current state of non-enforceablity.

This is sort of how putting hits on people actually works or has in certain scenes.

You don’t sign a contract or put out a bounty (unless you’re the state, that’s illegal), you just let everyone know that you’d hypothetically pay whomever killed the person you want offing.

As a bonus you can then say you were just joking (ofc that risks you being offed too)

AI could help editors translate from other languages, but beyond that, it’s an inefficient mess that Wikipedia doesn’t need, plus given how much of AI is just regurgitating Wikipedia, It’ll give itself mad cow AI disease.

That’s a real issue, but the article uses it as a jumping of point to get for AI slop.

Wake up Lemmy, it’s time for your daily, Wikipedia should have more AI slop article.

Let’s make it 1400 words this time, and make sure to mention that younger generations watch Ticktok, but ignore that most TickTok slop is just people summerizing Wikipedia articles.

This sounds a lot like every framework, 20 years ago you could have written that about rails.

Which IMO makes sense because if code isn’t solving anything interesting then you can dynamically generate it relatively easily, and it’s easy to get demos up and running, but neither can help you solve interesting problems.

Which isn’t to say it won’t have a major impact on software for decades, especially low-effort apps.

I sometimes wonder if Qmail had had a clear license, if Gmail would have destroyed the self-hosted mail ecosystem so thoroughly.

Sounds like stuff Stalman wrote about 45 years ago, are windows users really that far behind?

This has been true for a long time, CPU sockets don’t last long enough to make upgrades worth it, unless you are constantly upgrading. Whenever i’ve built a “futureproof” desktop with a mid-high end GPU, by the time I hit performance problems I needed a new motherboard to fit the new CPU anyway. Only really upgradable components are storage and ram, but you can do that in your laptop too.

The main advantage of Desktops is still that you get much more performance for your money and can decide where it goes if you build it yourself.

That’s less efficient than having a stack of 3-4 orders you can work on, this is true in many jobs, and I assume true in bartending as that’s the standard worldwide.

I don’t think they had any way to refuse an illegal order.

They could literally just not carry out the order, that’s why the CCP brought in out of town troops. I don’t know the structure of ICE but it seems they are doing the same, troops from Texas and Arizona are more likely to shoot Minisottans than Minisottan troops, and I suspect they would do the same if they deployed the military.

If the gains are minimal why is it standard for bartenders at busy bars to keep a stack of 3-5 orders they are working on?

Service takes longer because bar staff can’t handle multiple orders at once, and if there’s multiple staff it takes additional time to get them to come round.

Doesn’t seem like it would be that hard to adjust how you serve to accommodate having a queue though

It won’t be their neighbors though it’ll be troops shipped in from the other side of the country just like in China.

Civil wars require 2 sides capable of taking power.

People forget that labor unions were a major factor in Tiananmen Square, US labor unions are not a credible threat to take over so don’t need to be put down as brutally.