Last three or four years, all of our UI were done in Blazor server. Some are in production for more than two years.

I am not saying that there are no tradeoffs, but if you are already familiar with the dot net environment and c#, writing app in Blazor could be the right path, especially for backoffice apps.

I am just started fiddling with the latest version that automatically switch from server side to wasm without the user even noticing, and it is an awesome tech. There are still some tradeoffs, but they keep polishing the stack.

For context, I do write some react from time to time (outlooks addin) and razor pages, but I still prefer Blazor over these techs.

This is SO true!

Razor pages extension? .cshtml Blazor component? .razor

You can remap IMAP source folder to destination folder. It’s very likely that sent folder needs to be remapped between different hosts. I suggest you to use the dry-run option and examine the log to see if the folders are correctly mapped.

More in detail, I created an user just to run imapsync as a good practice in Linux. Then downloaded imapsync in a subfolder of the user home directory, created two very simple scripts, one with the imapsync command with all the parameters I needed and one for the token. Lastly, using crontab -e, I added two entry one for each script.

You don’t need to put imapsync into etc, it is not a binary and, as far as I know, there is no package that you can install with a package manager, it’s just a script that you download and execute. Anyway, where you put that, its up to you.

Imapsync is a (PERL?) script you download, and then run it passing parameters.

If you need OAuth, and it seems so since you want to sync a Google account, you have to download some more files that help you obtain an access token for Gmail.

But as far as I remember, there are no config files needed to run it. Infact I am cron running it every 5 minutes to one way sync an IMAP account to Office365 (needs an OAuth token too, and a second script to refresh the token every hour)

Feel free to ask for more, but I cannot guarantee a timely response.

I now.

That’s the neet part. You can’t

A sad news. Condolences to his family. May his legacy continue to inspire others as he did.

I come from VyOS and really liked it, but still prefer opnsense for the GUI, constant updates and plugins. VyOS started losing appeal once they opted for subscription stable iso access (even if they did give me a free subscription for some comment contribution in their repo). Also, I have to admit, that VyOS needs a fraction of the resources needed by opnsense.

Since last update, 2.13 I think, it does not work well with gog games, at least was not able to install flatout and pillars of eternity, both from my gog library. Nonetheless I was able to install pillars from the epic store, using heroic. With flatout I spent a week trying to debug installation problem, clear cache, reinstall of heroic, and everything else and then simply used lutris which installed flatout at first try and let me play right away (steam deck)

I tried virtualizing Windows on proxmox and it went smooth

I played it first when it was a free mod and then bought on steam and put on my backlog list because I really enjoyed what I saw back then.

Now, wouldn’t be amazing if someone develop, you know, HL3 or at least episode 3? The game script wasn’t published some time ago because of copyright expiration? I would pay for it, and I am sure I am not the only one.

I know Microsoft didn’t get this right with naming and you got caught in the trap but there are 2 (actually 3) ways of hosting Blazor.

I also see that this confusion won’t help OP choose Blazor over some more coherent dev environment hehehehe

You are talking about Blazor webassembly, I am talking about Blazor server side, which loads as fast as a “normal” website.

Server side Blazor has other caveats, that’s why I specified it is an intranet project, where server side Blazor fits very well. Anyway, at the moment, Microsoft is still putting effort in polishing both type of Blazor hosting model.

This is not our first Blazor intranet web app and some of them are running in production for one year more or less.

It is really a joy to program using Blazor, especially if you need cross tab/browsers/device/user real time communication, which comes almost free thanks to underlying SignalR channel.

My two cents: I strongly agree with this. We just deployed an intranet blazor server app running on Linux (don’t know which distro) and apache (we might switch to nginx soon). It works very well and we had to write less than 100 lines of JS (mostly for file download and upload) One of my workmates was hired one year ago and at the time he didn’t know anything about .Net stack. Now he is mostly autonomous and he loves .Net and blazor in particular. Obviously YMMV.

I don’t know from 1903 to 1980 but from 1890 to 1903 they did not fly at all. The first “modern” flight happened in December 1903.

Me also can’t stand the changed control panel UI. Most of the times I just hit WIN+R and type “control”

I am using windows 11 since the preview both for work (dev) and for gaming (although I switched to the steam deck as my main gaming platform) and don’t remember any breaking or blocking bugs. On the contrary, using bluetooth headset got a lot better and easier with win11. Which bugs did you spot?

Sorry for your loss, looks like she was a good girl. 😢

I am not saying your server is not secure, but just fencing off IMAP from the web is not enough to limit spammers from relaying mail through your server. They usually exploit a misconfigured SMTP server, which does run on port 25 (plain or start TLS mode)