• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 9 days ago
cake
Cake day: October 31st, 2026

help-circle
  • It depends. Some services, like native XMPP, don’t work through a standard HTTPS reverse proxy. Tailscale, NetBird etc. handle them fine, but you need direct TCP access or TCP forwarding instead. Other services can use HTTPS without problems.

    I think the HTTP versus HTTPS distinction is less important when you only access services through a trusted LAN or a private tunnel.

    Tailscale and NetBird already encrypt traffic between devices, and isolated containers provide another layer of protection. Plain HTTP on a LAN still carries some risk, but I’d argue that HTTPS is less critical in these circumstances.

    In your particular case, NetBird’s reverse proxy can handle HTTPS for the browser while the service itself uses HTTP over the encrypted tunnel.

    Just make sure that your proxy actually restricts access to your private network.

    So the answer is “it depends”.





  • Hmm. I think the issue with all these phones is that the modems can support those bands just fine but they’re generally tuned for Asian and European markets. Predominantly because those sorts of phones sell en mass there, maybe.

    For example, I have a duoquin F22 pro (think modern Nokia). I know that folks over on XDA have flashed CFW to region unlock them for US.

    You might be able to find what you want (the Cubots sound like a near match) quite cheaply but you’ll have to check XDA for CFWs first. Quite a few of these phones ship with unlocked bootloaders and AOSP by default so they are pretty easy to tinker with.

    Else… How do you feel about the JellyStar?

    https://www.unihertz.com/products/jelly-star




  • Why should I give a flying fuck? I have 3 lenovo tiny boxes, a Rpi4 4gb I got pre 2020, a stack of old laptops and phones, a compute stick and 4 tablets. And if I want to tinker (and I do), ESP32 + CYD is hard to beat.

    The Pi 5 does nothing for me that I can’t do faster or cheaper (or both) elsewhere. I could literally spend $20 on a WYSE thinclient to get something that’s 3-4x the pi while being comparable in power draw.

    No…if I want a shiny, I’ll get a FPGA or a Commodore 77. If I want to thinker, I’ll get ESP32s. And if I want low power always on compute…well, I’m good thanks.





  • They are the way to go, but hardware pricing makes it cost-prohibitive to match frontier capabilities, which makes decomp and recomp difficult. Or rather, they require more skill and take longer, introducing some barriers against the current floodgates being flung open.

    We all know the eye-watering prices GPUs and RAM cost now, to say nothing of Unified Memory devices like the Strix. Most people just don’t have a spare $10K to throw at an inference box that can run (say) a 300B model at interactive (not batch) speeds.

    Coming at this from another angle tho, I note that according to Steam stats, the most popular consumer GPUs are in the 8GB and 16GB range…which is smack bang in the VRAM range of what a good MoE (say, Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B) runs on (for 8GB) or arguably the best local dense coder (Qwen 3.8 27B) can live at. Which leaves us with a capable assistant and a capable coder.

    I think there’s probably room for LLM improvement in the 8–16GB range too…and given that most consumer PCs and laptops live there, I’m sanguine the open-weight devs might make it happen.

    But I also suspect the gatekeeping of high-end capacities is intentional.

    We’re probably not going to have the ability to vibe code Mario into Elden Ring again…not without significantly more skill. Dunno.