• 5 Posts
  • 224 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2023

help-circle





  • This will be great for the workers, but I don’t think it will necessarily fix the issues in Bethesda’s organization when it comes to game development (and it won’t make them worse either).

    Given what we know from Starfield, Bethesda is really lacking when it comes to planning: they aren’t doing a good job at establishing a compact vision for the final product which also results in having issues to establish an agile workflow to get from start to finish. In the best cases, this results in ludonarrative disonance where the story isn’t really supported by the mechanics of the game (example: Fallout 4’s story incentivizes the player to hurry up and look for their son, but they assign a lot of resources into making sandbox mechanics such as those related to base building); in the worst cases, this results in teams returning the ball to each other all the time because they aren’t properly coordinated to build things in the way other teams of the studio needs them, which loses a lot of time and becomes even more glaringly obvious the larger the project is.

    The silver lining is: this problem isn’t so noticeable when the designers have the template of Oblivion in their minds and they’re making Skyrim, but it was going to be completely exposed when making the jump to a new IP (and thus a new universe), with a new engine, with some large design jumps such as ceding ground to dynamically created areas; so ES6 doesn’t have to be as much of a low point as it has been Starfield, as long as they’re conservative in their design choices. I’d vastly prefer the leadership of Bethesda to be completely reorganized, which would allow them to innovate by taking well measured risks, but I don’t have much hope for that scenario.




  • Maybe one day we’ll experience it

    Not until you American liberals stop getting all pissy about people pointing out that Democrat politicians are terrible reformers at best and blatant hypocrites at worst. “Democrats defend universal healthcare!” And they don’t built a public healthcare system, instead sustaining the debt-based private healthcare that you all always complain about. “Democrats are forgiving college loans!” How about making public colleges competitive and granting ample public scholarships so that people don’t have to go into debt to get an education? “Republicans are outlawing abortion!” Yeah, after Democrats did nothing to enshrine it in federal law, despite the opportunities they’ve had while they controlled both the presidency and Congress.

    And you cannot even lay things clearly on the table either because the moment you denounce the farce for what it is, countless shills will come out of the woodworks to shout “Why are you supporting Republicans!?”, despite me not having said at any point of this post how you should vote at all, and well intentioned fools on the side will buy that thought-terminating cliche and assume that the Democratic party must not be criticized, at the very same time they lament themselves of how far from good enough it is, that no one is reforming, and that the party doesn’t listen to them. I guess they expect good things to materialize in front of them from nothing. Good luck with that.



  • We don’t even really need to check who has been defending or denouncing what if you want to see who’s committing violence, there’s an even more damning statistic.

    Number of People Killed in Deadly Attacks in the Post-9/11 Era, by Ideology

    • Far Right Wing: 134

    • Jihadist: 107

    • Ideological Misogyny/Incel Ideology: 17

    • Black Separatist/Nationalist/Supremacist: 13

    • Far Left Wing: 1

    It should also be noted that Jihadist terror attacks have almost as many victims as far right terror attacks because the former are just more efficient, but far right terror attacks are far more common. Check the graph in the article.

    The fact that the far right candidate has been under a murder attempt by another far right loon is just the cherry on top.