I assume this only applies ro domestic felines?
I assume this only applies ro domestic felines?
And that’s just 1 botnet out of many.
Imagine non-network wrench situation:
“The FAA has grounded all Boeing 737 Max 9 jets today after a massive decompression event occurred on Alaska Airlines at 16,000 ft. The door plug blew out of the jet at altitude. United Airlines has reported, after inspection, loose bolts the door plug of several of its Boeing 737 Max 9 jets as it continues to inspect every one if its 79 jets in its fleet.”
What’s the ratio of boeing door decompressions to IoT devices being hacked?
Or execs.
They’re pretty useful for sharing wifi logins in person for smartphones, for example.
Wow, you created this program for creating shaders visually? That’s impressive! You mind sharing the source code?
How would you implement piping in GUI?
Could you show us an example program with a GUI you created for this?
Sorry, life got in the way. I’m not surprised you’re not familiar with such matters.
I am surprised how much you support spreading hate speech by removing the ability of moderation.
You didn’t answer my question.
Who would pay for the platform, and who would moderate it? Or do you just want even more hate speech to spread?
A public forum, I assume paid for and maintained by the taxes of the public?
Ah, so you’re pro moderation when you personally find the contect to be even indirectly harmful.
“Double standards are bad, no matter which side.”
Why should anyone get to own the only effective avenues of communication? Communication is what determines how the world works.
Who currently owns the “only effective avenues of communication”?
CP is illegal obviously, and jihad doesn’t make sense in the cute cats category the way ‘straight only game mod’ makes sense in the ‘game mod’ category.
“Sometimes you gotta put up with some ugly if you don’t want people silenced for their perspective.” Seems there’s a limit to the ugly you’re willing to put up with, and you’re quite willing to silence perspectives yourself.
You cleaely still want people to moderate social networks. I assume you’d want these people to outside the company?
Whoa, that’s not very professional or acceptable :-)
Major media outlets and companies should not be considered private platforms.
Really? Now I’m curious, how do you imagine that?
I assume the company still pays for the platform, hosting, development, etc. Since it’s public, are they now subsidised by taxes?
Who moderates the platforms then? Are is it all just unmoderated?
Will companies get compansated for lost revenue?
I genuinely curious how you imagine this working.
Anyone can sign up and post while they use their money and influence to decide who gets heard.
Yeah, because it’s theirs. They own it.
If I let everyone into my house for a party, doesn’t mean I lose the right to kick people out.
Sometimes you gotta put up with some ugly if you don’t want people silenced for their perspective. I don’t want an echo chamber.
I’m okay with an echo chamber if it means I don’t have to put up with CP and jihadi execution footage in my cute cat feed.
I assume it would be no problem for you.
Okay, have fun a work tomorrow! Or don’t, as that seems to be your preference. :-)
No, but you can’t forcibly take and use someone else’s megaphone.
So private platform and private parties shouldn’t have the right to moderate and regulate their own spaces?
Maybe. Maybe it’s a “We can’t afford to alienate expensive engineers over stickers” thing, or a “We care more about the quality of work than sticks on laptops” thing.
Must be a fun place you work at. Do you wear a suit to work and work in cubicles?
Did you work with engineers?
Thank a christian for this.