- 25 Posts
- 112 Comments
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Dad Jokes@lemmy.world•Dad joke request: Stopped GO trainsEnglish
43·11 days agoI mean, you’re on the right track, but it’s a little stop and GO at the moment. Maybe you need more dad joke train-ing.
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•there's mostly only two relentless hardships in programming: networking issues, naming things, and off by one errors.English
7·11 days agoIt’s possible your coworkers are the ones dealing with those issues, and you just never notice.
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Dad Jokes@lemmy.world•I bought the world's worst thesaurusEnglish
37·19 days agoI have no words to describe this.
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•New compression techniqueEnglish
5·23 days agoThey said “perfectly”, not “90%”. You’re trying to move the goalposts.
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Dad Jokes@lemmy.world•I need help to complete a joke for my girlfriendEnglish
7·27 days agoSorry, but I think that’s a wrap on the conversation. She beet you. Sometimes, a joke goes flat and you’ve gotta roll with it.
all of your claims have so many asterisks attached that they’re essentially pointless
No they don’t, but say whatever you need to ignore me. That’s definitely what someone arguing in good faith would do.
internet access has been shown to have all the same negative effects
Citation needed.
it’s a useful technology
Quite the opposite, actually. It causes enormous problems and has no benefits that aren’t better served by existing technologies that lack those problems.
Nobody who uses AI treats it like a tool, they treat it like an employee they can claim credit for. And most tools aren’t actively detrimental to the user to the point of proven intelligence drops, lawsuits and environmental destruction. Also, the enemy charges you money to use it.
The only person who benefits from AI is the person selling it. So why are you trying to defend it?
I would rather wear a gimp mask. Less embarrassing.
And all without a single junior dev in the open office hearing their genius. Aside from the junior dev who bought the fucking thing in the vain hope they could roleplay as a more competent employee. That junior dev can hear themself going “no, fuck, delete, how do I- no, stop typing, you stupid fucking thing”, which I assume counts as “genius”.
Hang on. They had to ship three major updates in a single morning? How the hell is their workflow so bad that they have to- Oh yeah. Vibecoding.
If you see anyone wearing this shit, remember that you can laugh at how stupid they look as much as you want, and their weak copium that it’s a “skill issue” will be swallowed by their copium mask. So you’re free to laugh until they cry.
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•A software developer's wife asked him to get a gallon of milk from the storeEnglish
112·2 months agoAlternate version:
“While you’re there, pick up some bread,” she added. He never returned.
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Dad Jokes@lemmy.world•What is it called when a chameleon can't change colors?English
11·2 months agodeleted by creator
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Dad Jokes@lemmy.world•2 Minutes of Stewart Francis' Funniest One-Liners! | Live at the ApolloEnglish
4·2 months ago“Contains adult humour”, says the link preview. “Clean jokes only please”, says the sidebar. Yes, you literally misread the room.
Since this is an AI metaphor, the restaurant didn’t hire a cook. They just found a cook with an easily accessible oven and stole a pizza from it.
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Dad Jokes@lemmy.world•The English language is incompleteEnglish
9·2 months agoHi, sleep deprived. I’m dad! (See how that works?)
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•From a word document to an android appEnglish
13·3 months agoisn’t the easiest sell in the privacy community
This is the easiest way to tell this is a bot. They don’t even know what community they’re posting their ad to.
Susaga@sh.itjust.worksto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•From a word document to an android appEnglish
12·3 months agoYou don’t understand why an unfunny ad on a humour community with a rule against ads is getting downvoted?
RT*** isn’t pointing at RT*, he’s pointing at the TV showing RT**. The fact you think otherwise is what makes the image unclear. I’m not sure why you insist on them being wrong.

Yeah, it’s not a Perfect explanation, but I couldn’t make a pun out of the full explanation.