Just nope!

Considering how much value some put on the quality of wild salmon versus farmed salmon, I think it is pretty shallow to remove that information from packaging. I avoid products that have no country of origin on the packaging. I can easily see why some would be upset about this. This is inhibiting choice. Moreso the fishing industry will have to spend money to do this. Changing all the packaging will not come free of charge. Therefore you have to conclude it is nothing more than a con to make more money.

My point was that it may have been made useless. I seem to remember Louis Rossman complaining about it, but I have no idea over which issue. There is no point in having a right to repair act if it can still be abused in some way shape or form by large manufacturers.

I think the problem with this one was that manufacturers can hold all the cards on the cost of buying replacement parts. This would open up the issue of people being gouged. I was hoping that someone could give me more accurate information on the issue.

I am out of the loop on this one. I am probably wrong, but…Wasn’t the bill nullified by the fact apple has the sole right to supply the replacement parts? Or does the bill work as intended where replacement parts can be sourced elsewhere as well as documentation being made available?