Tlaloc_Temporal

Aren’t water flow, electrical flow, and mechanical flow all strictly analogous? As in mathematically equivalent, not just similar?

Was that Worms and the churning up of the sea floor, or was that earlier than the Ediacaran?

It feels like a persecution complex. “They hate us because we’re better, and they’ll always hate us! So keep doing what they hate! (And give us money)”

Lunch? Even better!

I believe you can just see the shadow of the beak on the right side of the crest. The crest splits and lays on both sides of the beak sometimes.

That’s not “litterally” how it works then, just “figuratively”.

In general, I agree, but spin is quite surprising in how much like angular momentum and dynamos it behaves. Either way, we don’t know enough about it yet, and it’s at best a coincidence.

That would instantly kill 80+% of bicycling for transportation in North America. I literally couldn’t even leave my house on my bike, and the pathway I use every day specifically designed for bicycle access to capmus would be useless, at it only connects to sidewalks.

Unfortunately, that’s limited to a single language, not international friendly. Having language at all makes it take longer to process too, but that’s not as much of an issue in this case.

And that’s why replacing coal with fission is a massive step forwards!

Yes, ion thrusters still use conservation of momentum to generate thrust. They aren’t limited by how fast or how hot we can make something explode though, so we can shove way more energy into the stuff they’re throwing out the back. They’re basically tiny coil/railguns, using electricity to move individual ions really fast.

In terms of efficiency, Ion thrusters are 4 to 40 times better than liquid fueled rockets. The draw back is that ion engines make very little thrust for the mass of the engine.

Coral trees are make of rock wood and each leaf is it’s own organism.

Would it? All the cars might just choose to take one of the turning lanes and leave the other half barren.

Chromodynamics uses colour to represent the three charges of the strong field, like + and - for the one charge of the electromagnetic field. It rarely interacts with actually visible light.

The Feynman diagrams? I think those just represent terms in a statistical integral. It’s a nice way of describing an otherwise horrendously arcane function.

Hopefully they keep the repairability, unlike Apple.

It’s older than genAI by at least a decade.

I’m pointing out flaws in your reasoning. Bulbous and small aren’t good categories, especially when you recognized that raspberries are different.

I would contest that the nature of a cultural berry is being a small sweet fruit that typically wants to be eaten. Strawberries sit alongside gooseberries, raspberries, cherries, and all the other traditional berries in this. Strawberries are certainly unique in their structure, but that doesn’t change how we eat them.

The botanical berry definition has little to do with the cultural definition besides taking the name. Try looking at the botanical definition of tree sometime. Does Bamboo count? Palm trees? Ginkgo? It’s a strategy for than a rigid group.

“Dark” here apparently means “unsern” or “hidden”, but it’s incredibly confusing.

Bayberries/waxberries aren’t really smootth, and Yewberries aren’t very bulbous.

Haskap berries are lumpy and mealy, are they not berries?

Do groundcherries count with their paper husk? Tomatillos? Cherry Tomatos?

Are cherries berries? Rose hips?

Cherry chili peppers are bulbous and smooth, are they berries?

Raspberries and blackberries often have little hairs growing off of each fruit, does that mean they’re not smooth? If hair is ok, kiwifruit are bulbous, but hariy.