657·
9 days agoGoogle 2024 Revenue: $328.28B
Apple 2024 Revenue: $385.60B
I’m sure they’ll behave in the future thanks to these Big fines…
WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]
- 0 Posts
- 75 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: May 6th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
3·11 days agoOTP for 2FA has just started becoming common here (US) within the last decade I think. Each bank has its own separate app and many banks seem to limit password lengths to less than other websites.
Never heard of this. Where is this at? :o
32·12 days agoSame with 574.59°F = 574.59K
5·15 days agoWe’re late getting halloween decor.
6·23 days agoDave Chapel skit, I’m pretty sure.
19·24 days agoI have only arsoned once* and 18797 is indeed over 9000. Why are those part of the same question though?
*I was like 5yo and the lighter claimed to be childproof, so I had to prove it wrong. In the middle of the night. Using the carpet. We put it out quickly though.
I sometimes instantly vibe with other NDs like that.
With NTs, this seems far exaggerated compared to how I personally feel*, but like still not wrong.
*as far as I know
2·29 days agoYeah. Not sure how long these kinds of things take. Would hope it doesn’t take much longer to at least get it in nightly. Seems like they added vertical tabs recently, so maybe they wanted to get that done first and groups will come soonish?
11·29 days agoIf you want an equivalent vehicle, you need that kind of capacity. If you want to match the range of a vehicle with a 24gallon tank (ie: if you want to convert a typical ICE truck into an EV), you probably need a 200kwh pack. If you want to match a ~12 gallon tank (ie: if you want to convert a typical ICE sedan into an EV), you probably need a 100kwh pack. If you had a car efficient enough to get 1000 miles on 100kwh, you’d be comparing it to a 3 gallon tank for an ICE equivalent. To match an 8 gallon tank (ie: a 2-seater car), you need about 60 kwh battery. Even if you want to compare a 80mile range fortwo EQ to a 300 mile range ICE fortwo, its already 300lbs heavier without even being close on the range and being quite limiting for even just normal commuting around here (assuming you don’t have a guaranteed charger at work).
Given what the top selling vehicles are in the US, I don’t expect people to be smart, even if they’re pay more upfront and long-term for their stupidity.
Lack of a need for that won’t stop people from getting them if that’s an option…
Probably about the same as such a battery, maybe a little less? The electric motor is still gonna push the EV weights above the equivalent ICE by a little. Either way, neither is gonna be comparable to the much larger vehicles on roads. Which includes buses (which I don’t think we should be trying to disincentivize although it should be considered in the planning stages of deciding between BRT and alternatives like rail). But due to the 4th power law, if we scaled taxes based on damaged done to roads, the only consumer vehicles (excluding things like trailers) that would even notice the tax would be a the few at the highest end.
I certainly don’t and wouldn’t consider it. But if someone wants 1000 miles of range, we probably aren’t getting that without some major technological breakthroughs in material sciences any time soon without packs around 100kWh.
Even if you don’t make them giant and obscenely inefficient, a 100kwh pack is gonna weigh over 300kg. Doesn’t matter if that gives it 1000 miles of range or 400 miles.
Has it even made it to nightly yet?
Does the scooter run on arch yet?
Halloween is an exception cause its the coolest one.
5·1 month agoTime doesn’t always go on the x-axis, but it is expected that the “independent” variable goes there, which is time in this case. This orientation does make it a lot more readable on mobile though in portrait mode, but the slider is unreadable in the mode. Which means it should probably assume landscape mode anyways, in which case x=year would be better. Given the “x-axis” is at the top on the original, I think you are intended to look at it sideways (like a full page landscape graph in print form), such the the left side is the x-axis? But the %s being at the bottom of the new one make it harder to see that label (on mobile at least) and changes what is the implied x and y axis.
But if the independent variable was “words in a book” and you were using that to predict time needed to complete the book, time should be on the y-axis.
I hate when I try to remember my master password without typing it and panic that I’ve forgotten my password. But when I got to type it, muscle memory is still there so no problem.