Yes it’s what you think it is. I don’t think, however, that there is anywhere to report it that will care enough to do something about it.

I was mostly hoping to have you print out all 1000 or so moves as a prank. :D

Now do it for a stack of 12.

So what you’re saying is you don’t want to actually answer the question asked.

Check.

TAKE YOUR DAMNED UPVOTE YOU HATEFUL BASTARD!

I prefer the first scenario, personally.

If they set a legal precedent it might be game over for pretty much all of LLM.

Now you’re just teasing!

Everybody keeps saying “<X> will be great Someday™” in the tech world. Only Someday Never Comes, does it?

Full self driving by the end of this year. For the past who knows how many years, it seems. LLMbeciles will stop hallucinating sometime Real Soon Now™. Only the newer LLMbeciles hallucinate more than the older ones did. We’ll have humans on Mars by 2021 2022 2026 2028 2029 2031 2044 2046. We’ll have AI-powered humanoid robots doing our bidding in 2023 ???.

And so on and so on and so on.

So here’s the thing: until there is evidence of non-slip generative “AI”, just assume it will remain slop. Because that’s been the pattern of Silly Con Valley since the '90s.

I guess the enemy of my enemy is my friend?

NEVER make this mistake.

The enemy of your enemy is your enemy’s enemy and nothing more unless you have other commonalities with them.

This right here.

I use https://12ft.io/ to get past most (not all) paywalls. It works for this article.

Ah. The patsy. Got it.

Interesting. I had the same advice in mind for you. Amazing how that works.

Buh-bye idiot guy.

Oh, I’m aware that “no assholes” is an impossible dream. But if I start seeing assholes and idiots increasingly attached to specific instances, it’s incentive to perhaps just drop that instance. Different instances have different moderation policies and different target communities. For example “hilariouschaos” is an instance for people who’ve never left that 13-year old sniggering stage where “bewbs” is a word with intrinsic hilarity. So I can axe them comfortably.

Especially if the image is poisoned.

There’s a few things here that tell me it’s probably not copyright-theft-generated. The big one that’s easy to explain is the tail. The tail starts off from behind the mouse, snakes in front of the cloak and background (so far so good), but then, here’s the critical thing, passes behind the fern staff and continues on the other side of it, positioned properly and in continuity.

Copyright-theft-generators have tremendous problems with this because, as the chorus goes, they don’t understand anything. There is no mental model of “a tail” with them. There is no thought of a tail’s properties, so keeping a tail contiguous while passing across barriers is very hard for them.

I must confess to requiring assistance here.

When I see hot takes that range from “WTF!?” to actual batshit insanity, I always look at the source. lemmy.world, shit.just.works, and a few others (including dbzer0) seem to always be the host.

Increasingly I’m wondering if it might not be best to just shove these into the “block site” box. The trigger finger hasn’t yet itched enough for it, but it’s getting closer.

This could also be a community dedicated to blind hate.

Which part of “Fuck AI” was unclear? There’s only two words there (well, a word and an initialization if you want to get picky). Which one of those was unclear?

I actually think that the prompt is, in fact, protected by copyright if it’s a non-trivial prompt. I mean “anime chick, big bewbs” won’t be protected by copyright, but a long sequence of detailed instructions would be.

What’s not protected by copyright (in any sane legal milieu) is the output.