I have an other 2-3 years with my 1600.
I have an other 2-3 years with my 1600.
Gaming, working (data processing, physical modelling).
The trick is to use a lower overhead OS than Windows.
I’m still using a i7-3630QM and a R5-1600.
They are both enough for what I do with them. Why would I upgrade?
I recommend LMDE nowadays, but it doesn’t really matter.
I feel vindicated that Vista and 8 where my favorite as well.
It’s not worth the cost of ruining LEO and the environmental effects of them burning up in the atmosphere
deleted by creator
I’m daily driving a 2013 laptop on Endeavour and it feels as fast as new stuff. Doing a lot of relatively heavy compute on it too.
Sponsors pay much more than views. So does patrons.
The true issue is discoverability in my opinion.
Where can I book a train to Europe?
I landed on oh-my-bash, zoxide and some other utilities. It really improved my terminal experience.
Move it to am external hard drive with anything else you want to keep, then you’ll have access to it on any computer no matter the OS.
Fair enough
Mercurial is way better.
There, I said it.
Please, most people don’t know how to use a scientific calculator at all.
That sounds great but I don’t want to keep the ‘rm’ muscle memory in case I’m on another computer and delete something important. Having to use ‘trash’ instead makes you more conscious when it errors out.
Alias rm to echo and install trash. Saved me many times.
Yeah at this point I’ve aliased ‘rm’ to nothing and exclusively use ‘trash’.
I’ve heard it’s less about the weight than the torque.
My modelling is CPU bound as it’s a model made in Fortran by physicists (me included). The fact is that I wouldn’t get a 4x boost, and a model running overnight still would. When I actually need performance I use a 1000 cores compute cluster for multiple days, so that would never run on any consumer CPU anyways.
For the data processing, the real bottle neck is disk access and my scripting speed, so the CPU doesn’t really need to be amazing.