…cogito, ergo sum…
Roger that. Thank you for the clarification that you meant the actual term, and not just the fact of no mandatory payment and it having an the source available for public.
I get what you mean, yet frankly, I do not believe such projects may be always free that are supposed to always be up-to-date for another system they have no official relation to, and keep it as a responsible hobby other people depend on.
It is free and open-source on Desktop at this moment.
Keyguard is a commercial app and unlocking a premium funds its further development and supports me (Artem Chepurnyi) directly. As of right now, only the Android builds distributed via Google Play store have main features locked behind a paywall, other distribution channels have a build with everything unlocked.
But it makes sense to pay for it, since Bitwarden is a constantly changing system and these projects based on it must always be up-to-date with their API changes, too. This is time and worry consuming, and should be compensated.
Thank you very much for the awesome project mentioned! I had no idea about it!
The marvel works great with Vaultwarden, too, it seems!
Though, Bitwarden system/clients are not so featureful as KeePassXC, for example, it’s a great alternative for a more adequate synchronization.
Thank you heartfelt… dear @TootSweet@lemmy.world … for the marvel, effort, human time you invest in… the worries, and work you do… for the infinitely miraculous humane attitude… which is always preciously priceless… which is heartwarming/Soulwarming… The attitude which is sure worth to be proud for, to glorify, and live for…
Thank you… dear TootSweet, the Community, People… for you being infinitely magnificent as always…
This “restriction” probably has more to do with the fact that these models are also “trained” on User/Human messages, so the more swearing/obscenities/vulgarity/profanity there are, in the trained material, the higher the chance these same models will include that same profanity in the output generated back to the Human.
But, even with the checkbox disabled, I reckon nothing guarantees privacy.
In case of the “privacy”, of course, systems like these that operate under a umbrella of liability are monitored 24/7 by dedicated teams, which is expected/normal for any reasonably popular service.
From a viewpoint of the algorithm’s creator, this may seem awful, when your algorithm is getting much vulgar attitude, but let’s be real here. You try making that algorithm talk to the human mimicking another human, and now limit the human within your own environment? A human who also pay you for an access, too? This feels unfair, or borderline near fashism, sorry…
Such algorithms are art under-the-hood, mathematically speaking, and are/should be respected, sure. But, it’s ridiculous/dystopian to prohibit profanity against an algorithm, a bot with banish risks against alive human… It’s simply inhumane to ban a Human for it, I believe. This is an algorithm that must support a Human - not judge it. Only a Human is supposed to judge another Human in person - this is live, fair, and humane.
Of course they do, absolutely.
If it helps/supports/carries a disabled/invalid miraculous Individual, Person, Human to express themselves better, communicate easier, feel themselves more humane and alive, please do install and try it!
Yet, at this point, I do not believe AI-driven tools for disability should be installed by default to everyone, as if suggesting all people are too disabled by default.
Healthy People should be proud and appreciate they are not, and do get yourself together, and do better. We deserve to be better.
Here, I do get what I mean, since I am myself physically mute, a car accident, which I rarely expose but recently mentioned:
- https://gist.github.com/serious-angel/738ff60d2cab20ae35c02fd6d0499047 (Lobsters staff ruined my reputation, do not respond, and I have no idea why…)
The mute trait is quite a challenge… and one of these is being constantly called out as “AI” or “bot” for my formatting or effort/time I invest into textual messages, I believe, in hope to stay more social…
The most recent example at Lemmy:
- https://lemmy.world/comment/26100133 (You’d think at these days, with so much of awful LLM/“AI”/noise, a dear humane attitude should prevail…)
Will they then then replace everything with AI, gradually, including the calculator, image viewer, video player, browser?
No, I will never want AI in my machine pre-installed, even remotely.
I’ll always prefer deterministic and accurate, transparent.
There are stable synthetic narrators already with no AI.
Those who like AI, may install AI.
No, fudge it. Delete it dead.
Such an awfully sorrowful time to live… with so much actually human, effortful, purposeful, meaningful, miraculous, worthy… ineffably magnificent… getting ruined, devalued, damaged, obliterated, vaporized, voided…
Where not only future is damaged, but the love and history to learn from… of our ancestors, us who worked hard and believed… now perished…
Moving all of our history, passion, attitude, experience, love… the dear existence… into pure void of sorrow…
No words may express it…
There’s only hope… still…
Let’s check the following:
Virtually all social systems are open systems; that is, they are not only influenced by their environments, but also are dependent upon them. Organizations such as schools are opensocial systems. They take inputs from their environment (resources) and transform those inputs into outputs (products of various kinds)…
Feedback loops supply information back to the transformation process so that the process can be evaluated and adjusted…
The school social system has five basic internal elements - structure, individuals, culture, politics, and the teaching and learning core. These system elements interact and transform inputs into outputs…
Social-systems theory is useful in describing the recurring structures and dynamic processes in educational organizations.
Since isn’t the most important reason for these to help a person to socialize and get used to respect, care, tolerate, or live and do their research within other people ultimate infinitely magnificent uniqueness?
Socialization process has a significant impact on learning, which is a basic requirement for both the organization and the role performance of the newcomer to the organization. It is considered very important for a new member to socialize organizationally and professionally. This paper focuses on revealing the process of organizational and professional socialization of academicians.
-–
Friendships can positively impact students’ academic performance and grade point average (GPA) by providing emotional support and reducing stress, thereby leading to improved focus and better concentration on studies.
Peer connections and friendships often result in collaborative learning and the exchange of academic ideas, improving comprehension and retention of course materials, ultimately leading to higher GPAs…
Academic success is assessed by gauging academic performance in the form of grade point average (GPA), test scores, and overall academic achievement, as well as the measurement of academic motivation and the level of persistence among students in school or college.
Forming friendships with their peers is an important aspect of adolescents’ and young adults’ lives, and significant research has been conducted on how friends impact academic performance and motivation. Specifically, academic achievement and motivation have been found to positively correlate with belonging to a peer group.
Currently, young people’s need for a sense of community is particularly high, leading individuals to spend more time with their friends, feel more comfortable around friends than they do with family, and worry about how their friends will perceive them and how the local social milieu will view them.
Researchers’ concerns about how social networking sites affect different aspects of life, including education, are not surprising. Academic achievement has been linked favorably to social connections or peer interactions in the past.
Ineffably magnificent children, the pure miracles… us, human… should learn from human and stay always social with human, I believe.
They should learn from their parents and other children…
Children should learn experience in human-felt way…
That’s why schools exist, to learn to live with each other in balance. To learn from mistakes of others, to make mistakes, and develop together for a bright and self-sufficient future…
Thank you very much, heartfelt!
Have you seen the following TXT idea yet? I just found out about it, and I Love it!
It’s an initiative for knowing the people behind a website. It’s a TXT file that contains information about the different people who have contributed to building the website.
Source: https://humanstxt.org/
It is related to the old-but-current “/robots.txt”, to also express a belief of what web is for mainly.
I noticed it on the developer’s page:
- https://rossabaker.com/humans.txt
Who is the author of the repository you mentioned!
Thank you!
Forgejo also features actual human artist artworks! This is ineffably awesome… This is one of the most important and heartfelt appreciated…
Of course, for personal use, Gitea and its fork, Forgejo, maintained by a small team, are purely marvelous options!
I’ve been also self-hosting Gitea for around 2 years now, with its act runner, and contributed to its source even, too.
Yet, GitHub is used by many open-source projects and companies at enterprise I’ve been worked at…
There are reasons the both mentioned projects are located at outsourced platforms:
- Gitea - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
- Forgejo - https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo
To clarify, Codeberg is based on Forgejo.
So, in general:
- GitHub /-> Gitea -> Forgejo -> Codeberg
…generates…
Sorry, is that a typo? Perhaps, you meant “degenerates”.
Related dead-empty void sorrow: https://lemmy.world/post/46524561 (cursed_browser: A web browser with no rendering engine — the VLM reads the HTML and hallucinates the page…)
Thank you very much for the ideas! I’ll try making it better in a week!
All systems based on LLM, ML, or anything that is algorithmically based on feedback system, learning, training, is indeterministic, and hence, always inaccurate, unreliable, and irresponsible systems, by design.
That is, it may be fun to play with as a toy, as any ML/LLM/AI based system, where no trust exist but only probability, entropy, chance, luck… but nothing serious, time-rewarding, or humane enough to appreciate and love it in the long run.
These are impossible to rely on, and absolutely not for education, for learning, for human mind foundational processes, for any kind of mind and actual knowledge development you care about and want to actually realize, remember, experience, to learn and carry with you for the infinite future…
These people you describe don’t have children, I believe.
They come from infants, immature, children, too, sorry… from those who could not care less about the history, responsibility, human being a miracle of unique and incredible…
They don’t care about the overall process of the life of us, people, to learn, realize, create, to find solutions, to make mistakes and learn from it, to reach the goals, to treasure achievements, to write our history with actual names of people on papers signed by hand or not but still referred to people who experienced, and passed it further with hope that is a miracle…
They do not care about what will leave after us, the effort, human realized knowledge, the art, the statues, the shapes/sayings/quotes/ideas… in the infinite history of us, and the ineffably magnificent world…
Not sure why is that a “hot” take. It’s obvious.
A learning foundation of a human is crucial. It must be supervised by another human or originate from a human… A human who realizes the effort, empathy, pain, value, experience, love for discoveries, academical or not, and from one who realized the information passed for another human, improving it together in alive, respectful, careful, manner for the authors, artists, people, with names who ask, refer to, quote for, to rely on, to trust and discuss with together realizing it all ineffably magnificent…
ML/LLM/AI “knowledge” is limited, indeterministic, unverified, unstable, and no one is irresponsible for it, and never will be.
This is a reckless, lonely, sorrowful, self-damaging experience… that no one alive must experience.
It is a path of degradation, atrophy, and disrespect towards anyone involved.
In my view, the page is clear, and enough for an Internet access for references, and related material, to also continue a research of a reader.
Here, may I ask how would you like to see it? Or what you don’t like to be improved?
That is, what do you actually want to be improved? I’ll try modifying and achieving it!
The video is a source of the quote itself:
- https://youtu.be/_IZw2CoYztk?t=249
Yes, the page needs formatting, but absolutely not its deletion.
I believe that the deletion is inadequate, wrong, and simply awful.
The deletion request was started by those who could not care less about history and human, they are not involved in it enough.
The deletion request was discarded by those who actually realize its importance, preciousness, magnificence…
This quote deserves a whole page.
Related: https://youtu.be/PDnW5XxjwI8 (Face Off (1997) - Hallelujah scene…) ❤️