Consistency with their previous default desktop environment, Unity.

Or companies do hire security, but the security team is incompetent and unable/unwilling to adapt to new challenges. Then it devolves into security theater, until either someone new comes who cleans house or a breach happens.

Arch: I need reproducible setups. Also bleeding edge is not for me.

I have to give credit to their documentation though!

What put me off selinux is that the officially documented way of generating a new policy is to run a service unconfined, and then generating the policy from its behaviour. This is backwards on so many levels… In contrast policy-based admission control in kubernetes is a delight to use, and creating new policies is actually doable outside of a lab.

Confucius says: man who runs in front of car gets tired; man who runs behind car gets exhausted.

so what are the reasons why it’s a bad daily driver?

Don’t need to go any further than “default user is root.”

The pun is so bad it made me sigh. Top quality dad joke!

Legally it is quite clear. Taking a description of a closed source program and writing a new one is ok in most cases (unless that description is API docs - see Cisco vs Arista). Taking a look at closed source software and then implementing your own version is poison as far as OSS goes. OP implemented the first version, so that’s already a problem. They may get away is they describe what the program does to someone else and let them implement it, but OP would not be able to touch the source code

Take a machine with Linux preinstalled. Will it run Linux without problems? Yeah, of course.

Take a machine with Windows preinstalled. Will it run Linux without problems? Check the list.

Why not both?

They aren’t lap cats. They’re trying to smother you, but are not very good at it.

Configure port forwarding for the VM.

I kept scrolling through thinking whoever designed this was definitely not responsible for cleaning. The sheer despair I would feel if I had to dust all those rock surfaces!