looked like this, just less German

Hard to find a high resolution shot of an English phone? Our technological history already slipping away!

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said “faster horses.“ surveillance capitalism.

In the middle there?

They all look pretty great!

pls

Try this simple cookie recipe

You mean due to the risk of accidentally hitting a button that sets the seat to a short position while you drive?

Maybe they just hit a button (1, 2)

Kids after three minutes on TikTok

Gonna need bigger truck nuts

They can also do intelligent searching and simply surface links.

Do I trust LLM summaries? Not fully. But how about the strategy used by an app like BeyondPDF for Mac:

Think: Firefox does the search, then gives you the sources and the most likely relevant excerpts from each. Consequences of it searching wrong? A small waste of time, but no misinfo.

Sidebar!

One can be against environmental costs of great machine-learning powered search, and offended by the arguable IP theft that created the tools, but it’s unlikely all those who say they “don’t want AI anything!” really mean that entirely.

“I don’t want or need the current version of ChatGPT for my use cases” is very fair though. Maybe they don’t have any SQL queries or Excel formulas - on the edge of their abilities - to build, or text to beautify, or quirky esoteric philosophy to bounce off a robot…

Yeah if where’s the thrill if you’re just gonna be notified of nukes & nados like a wuss

Also personally, prefer a 0.00% chance of finding a wandering elderly person or abducted kid to 0.00001%

(If either feature were frequently abused that would change my calculus, or maybe if I had severe anxiety(?) or a critical sleep schedule or something)

Edit: I mean this more lightheartedly than it sounds

@pooky55@lemm.ee - best practice is adding [2016] to end of headline

Lemmy’ll let ya edit it now still!

I doubt this data is actually available, right?

You want affordable food, you WILL pay them with your data. Always on location please! Oh and precise as well, thank you.

I’m proud of her!

Wish we’d had her in the last debate :-/

“ew”

Bollards are cheap, so by all means put them in the requirements.

Ya. If people are getting hurt way too often and a reasonable investment would prevent a commensurate number of injuries, maybe it’s OK to use raw numbers to shock the company/legislators and action.

I would def give you that “X preventable injuries could be avoided for [$Y]/[$Z per injury]”, and some context on how much could be done if that money were spent another ways, would be good.

Stereotypes. A few that come to mind:

An affectation like a lisp

A buzzcut

An androgynous appearance

the idea

win the election

not

lose the election.