I know youre joking but I also can’t help but to clarify that there is a plastic barrier there

Almost like theres a difference in attention.

This is an interesting idea:

The “at least one” in the prompt is deliberately aggressive, and seems likely to force hallucinations in case an article is definitely error-free. So, while the sample here (running the prompt only once against a small set of articles) would still be too small for it, it might be interesting to investigate using this prompt to produce a kind of article quality metric: If it repeatedly results only in invalid error findings (i.e. what a human reviewer  Disagrees with), that should indicate that the article is less likely to contain factual errors

Did the virus affect the rat in the beginning? Was it playing dead?

Maybe it depends what you’re fishing for. Seems true to me. It also seems like they jump more in the rain.

I see you’ve also purchased a new scratching post

Is the project current? I see an archived repository.

How was he different when they were together?

/gen

The example that the other commenter gave did not require the user to input the flags. As far as I understand, they mean there would be a number of secondary functions that will call the other with the correct parameter.

What pattern should be used instead?

what are those

Full body blow dryer

I was not justifying his actions, I was offering possible explanation. I was also not evaluating/grading him or his actions.

I think his behaviour sort of makes sense if you consider how scary it could be for him (bear with me).

He’s clearly in the wrong. He knows it. Especially in the court of public opinion; he hit a kid, walking to school. It’s broad daylight and it happened at a crosswalk. It’s not looking good.

Surely, then, it can’t be his fault. Taking responsibility is not an option, it doesn’t even cross his mind. If he lashes out, if he berates the person he hit for doing something wrong, maybe he can convince himself it wasn’t his fault. Maybe he can convince the girl or the bystanders that it wasn’t his fault.

I think this is also why people can be so opposed to bike lanes or other infrastructure that promotes mixed use of roads. When most things are built with only cars in mind, it’s easier to blame a pedestrian or cyclist because they seem to be guests in a space for cars.

I sort of assumed this was common. If its not, that explains how some people can watch AFV or boxing and not feel the icky tingles and nausea.

Makes sense, thanks!

Limits still are not intuitive to me. Whats the distinction here?

Whats that about frogs?

TIL that they use a strap on heartbeat monitor inside the birth canal (womb?)

I usually try to just edit the large sections that could be deleted (making them longer).