El Barto

It’s not only about seeing the markings. It’s also about recognizing potential colliding objects in less than ideal scenarios.

Would you chip in to cover the development expenses?

2019 Hyundai Ioniq, fellow Hyundai owner.

I wouldn’t say no one.

Can you be more helpful? Search for what?

Yup, I literally trust a rabid lion more than a rabid bear.

getting in won’t do you a lot of good with an “empty tank” anyway,

Don’t tell me how I want to use my car. If I want to sit inside a dead car, that’s my decision.

But more seriously, there are valid reasons for wanting to get inside a dead car, including safety related ones.

That’s the reason I settled for an EV with physical buttons and knobs, even if it’s an older model. No regrets.

Why not both?

If you’re uninformed and it doesn’t affect you, congratulations. The system is working for you. Unfortunately, that’s not the case for everyone.

I’m tired of this hyperbole. Of course there is accountability for businesses in the USA. Not for all of them, I admit, but it’s absurd to say “no one follows the law in the USA.”

This is the first time I hear the term weaponizing in the way you describe it. I would have said “AI obliterated the chore of finding the right answer from SO” or something similar. To me, weaponizing means, using against a person or entity.

But regardless, thanks for explaining.

Thanks!

What do you mean by weaponizing?

What’s an NPU?

Last time I tried to look up how to fenagle a dingle, Google showed me ads about how to friffle bahoonies for two pages, and finally out showed me the dingle fenagling algorithm in the ancient Expert Sex Change website.

Regex and other forms of complex pattern matching are way easier for a computer than a human.

I know what you meant by this, but I still chuckled. Humans are the ultimate pattern matching machines in the whole solar system.

I miss mine.

You could sue those assholes in The Hague, toch?

Thank you for the context…!