While higher prices cab make products more appealing, that is not the primary reason why vegan products are more expensive.
While higher prices cab make products more appealing, that is not the primary reason why vegan products are more expensive.
Correct. That’s precisely why producers of meat patties can still be profitable at a much lower price point.
It’s social media, who’s making scientific postulates?
It’s a lemmy comment.
It’s not rudimentary, it’s a complex system reduced to a few sentences.
Vegan patties have been around forever.
There aren’t significantly more barriers to entry for food products than other industries.
Yes vendors want high prices, but that applies to any product, not only vegan products.
The answer is, as everyone else has pointed out, economies of scale. There’s a larger market with more participants producing more beef burgers than there are vegan patties.
This is contrary to basic economic principles.
If a beef burger and vegan burger cost the same to make, but people will pay more for the vegan, that world attract more vegan producers to the market, and more competition would reduce the price.
The flag looks a bit like a disgruntled goose.
Obviously. Why is that threatened by this antitrust ruling ?
Nonsense. The users who have left are an infinitesimal portion of users.
This article doesn’t even bother to explain the connection. I don’t get it if I’m honest.
booking.com is the worst I’ve encountered. There’s a captcha type anti-bot thing that I can’t pass with firefox. I think it uses canvas.
edit: another I use all the time is called echo360. It’s the platform my university uses to host lecture videos. The player just plain doesn’t work in firefox - blank screen.
So that makes odysee’s behaviour OK?
Yeah it really does seem this way.
I’ve never been a “free speech absolutist”. I acknowledge that censorship is problematic, but it seems much less so than the alternative.
I hadn’t heard of this.
The FAQ says it’s not a 1 for 1 replacement. There’s a lot of features which can’t be ported.
It’s probably better than nothing for most people, but not as good as uBO was.
Still, I wonder why it’s not mentioned more often.
Meh.
Librewolf already breaks loads of websites with it’s fingerprinting resistance - just get used to turning it off.
In any case, you already need a chromium fork handy for all the sites that just plain don’t support firefox any more. I’ve run in to weird issues in firefox that don’t arise in chromium several times in the last month. This is going to get much worse.
As for changing browsers. I don’t care very much. I don’t use many browser features like bookmarks or passwords.
Land or livestock.
I too am a fan of fall of civilisations!
What does “compensated well” mean in this context though? There was no currency with which to pay. I thought compensation was mostly food, beer, and lodging.
The article seems to be based on a number of flawed premises.
Firstly, that chatgpt is the only LLM. It’s not, and better, stronger, cheaper alternatives are likely to emerge.
Secondly, that LLMs are a step on the way to AGI. Like any minute now they’re going to evolve. They’re not, they’re a one trick pony which is making coherent sentences. That’s it.
I think the difference between employee and slave is much less than we might think in today’s terms.
The workers were there by choice, and they were treated well enough to want to be there, but I don’t think most of them were paid a wage.
This is a really valid point, especially because it’s not only faster but dramatically cheaper.
The thing is, summaries which are pretty terrible might be costly. If decision makers are relying on these summaries and they’re inaccurate, then the consequences might be immeasurable.
Suppose you’re considering 2 cars, one is very cheap but on one random day per month it just won’t start, the other is 5x the price but will work every day. If you really need the car to get to work, then the one that randomly doesn’t start might be worse than no car at all.