spermy scat sometime soon

Washington state largely does this. Voters’ Pamphlets

OracleMaker was too problematic.

Unopened empty can of tuna

I call shenanigans!

It is, but it’s unambiguous enough that OpenStreetMap adopted it instead of the British English term.

(deleted duplicate)

In democracies, laws exist to grant people freedom from the power of the state, not to grant the state freedom from the power of the people. Any laws that grant cops protection from the people are laws of a tyranny. We get only the protections of the state that our rights make possible and no more. Trading freedom for security gets us neither.

Correction: In democracies, laws exist to grant power to the state, not to grant people freedom from the state. For example, I’m guessing that in your nearest democracy, there’s probably not a law granting you the freedom to stand still for more than a minute or lie down for more than a minute. The people’s freedom is a default.

Now, perhaps what you were thinking of was that some laws have exceptions (that might be phrased as affirmative defenses). But those aren’t granting freedom to the people, they are restricting law enforcement. It’s like a “tax refund” — the government isn’t giving you their money, it’s returning your own money.

French’s Ketchup is a thing too!

Relevant xkcd: Duty Calls

Come with me, and you’ll see: a world of purely jubilation.

If you need to ask for the current date so often, I suggest getting a watch. (not sure if joking vs predisposed for this part)

If you’re asking so often about recent things then, yes, hearing the redundant parts out loud is only irksome because they’ve already been delivered to you (by yourself).

On the other hand, if you’re asking someone when an arbitrary event happened (e.g. when reminiscing), having the year first quickens context.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G3ydJ20njyE

Which Adobe?

But if you accidentally typed a or i, press ESC first.

Ah, someone with experience with Solid Explorer. I’m hopeful you might be a power user.

Long ago, I looked into it, but was dissuaded because the details views therein seemed to waste vertical whitespace. An absurdly small font, close to the bottom of the icon to maximize empty vertical space, was used for details (at least datestamp, I think).

Is that still the case? Have they added a method to increase the font size of the details without also increasing (or perhaps simultaneously decreasing) the filename’s font’s size? I couldn’t find one when I tried it last.

If there’s an interview with the creators wherein they extol the virtues of vertical whitespace within an item, or if some reviewer has done that for them, I’d love a link or two to read about it, see what I’m missing.

I’m sure the functionality is great. It’s the presentation I didn’t like. But perhaps there are unintended consequences of a compact layout…

“the left”, eh? You are aware that plenty of people on “the right” allege things in social media that they would never put in a court filing, yes?

For much of our history, people didn’t live long. There’s a cost for so much safety and longevity that didn’t exist back then.

I’m not sure which editor you refer to as “the OSM editor”, but surely id has it, JOSM can specify it, and StreetComplete has numerous quests that are disabled by default for various reasons but can be enabled (with SCEE having even more).

As for routing priority, that depends on the routing profile used by the router; there are dozens of routing profiles among several routing providers, many of which probably don’t use smoothness but could. OsmAnd can — it targets some smoothness values like unpaved.

Possibly not “companion” per se, but Every Door is available for iOS and MapComplete can run in browser. Go Map!! can provide more detailed editing.

BRouter and other routing engines can use attributes like surface and smoothness (and probably width) to calculate routes.