Do you commonly interpret criticism as a request for a thorough academic study?
Do you commonly interpret criticism as a request for a thorough academic study?
You weren’t asked for anything, and this certainly isn’t the equivalent of book titles and the tools to make them.
It’s more like interrupting a discussion about someone who was just shot dead by police to say, “yeah, it’s called being shot”, then getting all pissy when someone tells you that actually, the broader issue is police brutality in general.
By talking about the effect (enshittification) instead of the cause (capitalism). One could read your initial comment and conclude that the only problem is enshittification, and not even think about capitalism as the cause, since you didn’t mention it.
So now you’re concerned with “looking cool”. Your priorities are very strange.
Are you trying to say NASA hires “too many women, LGBTs and brown people”, and that this is holding them back?
Is there something about straight, white cis males that makes them better at rocket science?
I don’t understand why, legally speaking, a distinction is made.
You don’t understand why the law distinguishes between a piece of digital art and Photoshop itself? Come on, dude.
But they’re not asing if the class is real
Graft means hard, honest work. Maybe you mean grift.
If that seems “smartypants” to you, your intellectual standards are set pretty damn low.
Mixing up cause and effect isn’t some minor goof. It’s the difference between eating bread and eating fire.