How is Telegram fighting for privacy while having no end-to-end encryption by default and no e2e encryption at all in conversation with more than 2 participants
How is Telegram fighting for privacy while having no end-to-end encryption by default and no e2e encryption at all in conversation with more than 2 participants
without being pwned
How do you know?
I can’t, I forgot most of it. But a little search returned some results:
But it’s also true that sometimes it’s not done with a pro-piracy stance but they would just rather have it pirated than bought through key-resellers as these can hurt indy-game dev a lot.
You are conflating the two meanings of free. Pirated software does not improve your freedom and open source is not necessarily free.
That being said I’ve seen a few indie game studios making pro-piracy statements or even putting the game on torrent networks themselves. But these are the one that deserve the most to be paid.
You really shouldn’t connect windows 7 to the internet.
But it’s not run in a sandbox. I’m not sure where you get this from.
Same, I could not go back now.
It build in a sandbox, but it’s not run in a sandbox.
Bash LSP server can use shellcheck and shfmt but you have to install those manually.
Funny thing is that LSP was actually created for VSCode. That’s the now standard protocol to decouple language specific things (completion, formatting, linting…) from the editor so you don’t have to use an editor for each language. You can now use any editor that supports LSP, either directly or through a plugin, and turn it into a fully fledged IDE by installing the LSP servers for the language you need. I guess some VSCode plugins use LSP under the hood and just embed the server.
Is pluging a LSP server that hard on vscode/intellij? Because it’s automatic with a lot of LSP clients, open a .sh
file, get asked if you want to install the corresponding LSP server, answer yes and that’s it. Some LSP clients don’t do automatic server install but you just have to install the server with your packet manager. At least that’s how it is with vim / emacs.
You don’t need a plugin, just use the bash LSP server with any editor that support LSP servers. It supports explainshell, shellcheck and shfmt.
uBlock Origin also does a lot more than just block request, I’m not sure features like cname uncloacking would be feasible as an userscript.
Why would you trust Greasemonkey and some random script over uBlockOrigin?
Also it might be possible to do it partly but performance would inevitably be worse and I’m not sure every functionality would be implementable.
Not sure Privacy Badger brings anything, it stopped doing local learning a long time ago. Just enable the anti tracking lists in uBO.
Those are just some uses of malwares. It’s not always that noticeable.
This is the first time you noticed you caught a malware. I wouldn’t be so confident about never having caught one and Im way more paranoid than you. This one was just really noisy.
I have only uBlock Origin and no YouTube update has gotten past it (except the first one for a few hours), I never get “disable adblocker” messages either. Also anti adblockers are not blacklist based.
Is it the company slogan? When searching for it the first result is the source of this image.
Anyway, it’s important to point out that its false.