maybe because a huge fraction of users wouldn’t understand more advanced tutorials, or it’d be just too much effort
maybe because a huge fraction of users wouldn’t understand more advanced tutorials, or it’d be just too much effort
trying to execute that requires the caller (so user shell
from using adb most likely) to have the same uid as Google Play which should never be the case
afair
why I prefer firefox over chrome/edge / other chromium forks
idk tbh, SafetyNet / Play Integrity have existed for a while
Kinda makes sense. A paid app on Google Play is a license to download the .apk file(s). Then a user could make copies, and without DRM, it’d be the same situation as with copyrighted movies and whatnot.
I’m not saying I support them, it’s just that they are like this for a reason
Maybe everyone was just OK with mobile devices being locked down heavily from the start, and now it’s more or less the same level for most
Is the bootloader unlocking requirement that FRP is not triggered a hard one or just because the settings screen isn’t (or shouldn’t) be reachable? Now that OEM unlocking and FRP aren’t tied together anymore, it doesn’t seem like a hard one
This could still be bypassed by flashing a new OS that deliberately messes up the userdata wipe-persisting secrets. Well idk if there’s a way to prevent that, but I guess really needy and tech-savvy people could recover lost devices that way
Looks like they “just” have to stop signing in with a Google account, and may have to enable adb and install apps using it / e.g. Shizuku
geeking out over what and playing what
I’m not old, I just like how short the command is
jokes on you one of my not so much into linux friends had it and his setup kept breaking, now he’s about to install fedora
no thank you
!for now!<
i like disabling apps I rarely use but still need from time to time, like Spotify
boobs
sd-boot or directly booting EFI stubs rocks
Windows is king at being inconsistent 🔥
If only they had trained advanced users to use the CLI that would never change unlike the GUI
I bet they at most remove control.exe or make it open the Settings app, but still allow launching old vendor .cpl items just like they already can be opened in Control Panel.
i don’t think m.wikipedia.org lets you do that sadly
Gestures don’t work with them too nicely. Also the recents screen is still from the built-in launcher, unless with root access of course