The Chattington-Hepsworth’s budget is only £856,200 and the Argentinian quadruple-glazed one of a kind photon-friendly volcanically baked silica panes are being held at Greenlandic customs for two days longer than expected, pushing the bilingual homeschooling couple perilously close to £857,000 in expenditure and risking an extension of Charles’ five year sabbatical and a postponement of Harriet’s gallery grand opening.

This sounds bad, but in Britain it is an honor unparalleled to be bestowed upon oneself the sum of multiple sausage rolls. 40 is approx $3.6 million.

Shut up, Greg.

You tempt fate when naming a vessel after an analytical framework of probability.

This should be standard—and we’ll see if people continue to eat meat.

He tried to change his name to “Ben Nitay” while living in the US.

The real third roach

I’m not suggesting you’re wrong to be surprised by this—just celebrating Simmons’ decision not to respond to the question.

It isn’t a requirement that anybody discusses their sexuality publicly. Society only expects explanation when someone is suspected of not being heterosexual.

Labour Friends of Genocide

Other manufacturers should have stuck with CCS.

They’ll fix it with a software update it’s not a real recall Teslas are different it’s not a real recall.

They often boast of being the “party of business,” but never the party of labour. Seems this council is simply taking Starmer’s lead.

Yes. The case in support of assisted dying and the safeguards required are outlined brilliantly here: https://humanists.uk/campaigns/public-ethical-issues/assisted-dying/

I bet these people love videos on perpetual motion.

UK did those tourists a favour.

Or just pay humans a living wage to do it today, no trial required.

Tesla’s on-wheel turn signal buttons are criminally bad.

I’m not really dancing around it. Our first past the post system is to blame for the difficulty. I want Labour to be beaten from the left (quite a low threshold these days), not by the Tories. Starmer winning by being not-the-Tories is not a particularly strong endorsement; it also hands him and Labour great power to act without much accountability to any particular programme. They’ve already abandoned serious policy, he has long since abandoned his leadership bid pledges, all the while taking spineless positions on a multitude of major issues.

With FPTP, clearly this year people must vote Labour if in their constituency it’s otherwise a win for the Tories. But where a third party could win, people should vote with policy and conscience in mind. That could be LD/Green/SNP/PC, perhaps. None are perfect, but a plurality (maybe coalition) would better serve the people over swinging from one morally bankrupt ruling party to another.

Personally, I’ve always lived in extremely safe Labour seats. I support vote swapping where possible, until we get a mature, proportional electoral system.

No. Though I don’t buy that voting for a party that has moved significantly to the right will somehow encourage them to move leftward, and not simply reward them for moving to the right.