A computer science enthusiast.

https://myxi.envs.net

  • 4 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle



  • myxi@feddit.nltoComic Strips@lemmy.worldWomen Should Just Be Honest
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I concur. It is also very hard to make a rationale for whether your date is ghosting you, is just busy, or is not in a good mood. Obviously, if she is not in a good mood or is busy, she would prefer not to reply to me (because she might unintentionally ruin the bond), but what if she’s just not interested in me and thus is ignoring me?

    If you like this person a lot, your feelings will likely corrupt your rationale. Your hopes won’t let you move on; you will keep suffering, deciding whether to move on or not.


  • These corporations would never let that be the norm. They are presently moderate about it because we are an extreme minority, but if this population starts growing at rapid rates, these leeches will go crazy. Just like how Google behaved a few months ago to prevent ad-block usage on YouTube. The unfortunate news is that we can’t even do much about it; they already have a scary market share and the money to do whatever they want. Worse thing is that these corporations will unite together in such scenario.



  • myxi@feddit.nltoComic Strips@lemmy.worldXXX
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    That just attracts certain creeps even more. They like nudes of unattractive people because it is its own kind of a validation that her boyfriend entirely demolished her trust for him (and that’s a big kink of them), because there’s no way she’s couldn’t tell she’s not attractive and therefore wouldn’t want everybody to body-shame her and that’s why she shared the pictures with utmost trust.

    I have seen such degenerates. They make incredibly disgusting and disheartening comments on the victim.


  • myxi@feddit.nltoProgrammer Humor@programming.devVariable Declaration
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I also leave out little syntax errors and only only focus on the rough idea during my train of thoughts. And the variables, aren’t really supposed to be implied as private or unused – I do eventually meaningfully use them. If I have to prefix all my variables with a underscore to avoid the LSP, I might instead just disable the LSP. When I eventually turn the LSP back on, it tells me the actually unused variables and imports that I can now get rid of.

    Because of the LSP, I used to write maybe three hundred lines of code per hour, but now I probably average at least five hundred or more.


  • myxi@feddit.nltoProgrammer Humor@programming.devVariable Declaration
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I turn off LSPs during my train of thoughts. I don’t want all red and yellow underline bullshit to disrupt my thoughts. Like, calm the fuck down. I WILL write the correct code eventually; just give me some fucking time.

    Well, I use Neovim, so turning off the LSPs or restarting them is sufficiently simple.

    When I work on a new project, or on a new feature, I temporarily turn off the LSP, and rely on the compiler to figure out where the code errors. Plain white text gives me the freedom to write whatever the fuck I want without any disruption. Of course, I eventually turn on the LSP again to fix the little issues.


  • Thanks for note. Do they currently have that backend?

    That aside, you might want to try Nim. It’s pretty cool. It can compile to C and C++, and JS. There have been browser extensions made with it. Heck, it even has an LLVM backend. And the C code it generates it pretty fast on benchmarks. It’s filled with tons of metaprogramming stuff and AST-level macros. And it has this cool thing where it can ignore name casing of identifiers like variables and functions; so isSome == is_some.






  • Hi, I spent some time trying out the dictd package. I also read this protocol’s specification. As things are right now, each host-name would require its own parser, because I couldn’t notice a very similar pattern between them. Webster, Jargon, wn, all these have their own standardization for including synonyms and examples.

    The specification doesn’t enforce any pattern on the definitions either. I don’t think it’s going to be very useful even if I do implement it because the parsers are going to be quite complicated.