Sorry, I’m firmly in Ada Lovelace’s camp for credit for first use of the term. https://medium.com/the-mumblings-of-a-security-professional/a-bug-in-the-machine-286800f71cbc
Sorry, I’m firmly in Ada Lovelace’s camp for credit for first use of the term. https://medium.com/the-mumblings-of-a-security-professional/a-bug-in-the-machine-286800f71cbc
I don’t usually run, but when I do, I run a mild/moderate fever.
Most? 🙂
True story, about 20-25 years ago, a radio station in my home town was playing ads for some new local business doing web design.
After hearing the ad on my drive to work for the umpteen billionth time I finally got curious and went to check out their own website (I they’re charging people to build websites, they’re own website must be a pretty awesome demonstration of their skills, right?)
The website looked like absolute garbage and, upon viewing the source, the meta tags clearly betrayed the fact that it was created in Word.
I can only imagine how much money they were paying to run those ads. I even considered the possibility I was being pranked somehow.
Completely irrelevant. The title and posted article are talking about unintentionally training LLM text generation models with prior output of other AI models. Not having enough training data for other types of models is a completely different problem and not what the article is about.
Nobody is going to "trawl the web for new data to train their next models” (to quote the article) for a model trying to cure diseases.
This is a threat to LLMs, not AI itself. AI models looking for novel cures for diseases (for just one of many examples) are not trained on random Internet text.
Be a goldfish table.
This would make an excellent short film. The fire axes scene would be epic.
In this narrow case, it’s considered proper/correct to pronounce the “x” like an “sh”, which greatly improves the tongue rolling.
… or xitter.
I don’t think any of those people are being relocated to Texas.
I’ll believe it when Ze Frank does a True Facts video on it.
I hate to say it, but I’m inclined to think that the Russian government may simply block access to Firefox (and the Firefox addons site).
Probably true, but that’s not justification for Mozilla to save them the trouble by doing it for them.
Link is to the second page of the article. I thought it was odd how it kept saying “Smith said” without identifying who Smith is.
How would they know now? It’s the same answer. Stop being a dick.
As I started reading the last sentence, I thought it was going to say, “This effect also works on dogs.”
IANAL, but I feel like if the heirs to an estate cared enough about the deceased’s Steam account enough to get the court involved, Steam wouldn’t have a leg to stand on. But that’s probably what it would take to get them to do the right thing.
Didn’t you read it? They said they would dry fast… and drink. Duh. /s
True. I was more responding to the article that makes no reference to Ada Lovelace. She’s deserves to be mentioned when that topic comes up.