I’m curious to know what happens if you ask ChatGPT to make you a text adventure based on that prompt.

Not curious enough to try it and play it myself, though.

Just because you added a question mark doesn’t mean it fits this sub. I think this post isn’t at all in line with what the sub is about.

If the emulator can’t run games from archive files, then I store what I play unarchived, and what I don’t play stays as archived as it was.

Unless they’re small files, then I’d probably back then up extracted. But I haven’t had a case where the files were small enough for me to store extracted but the emulator couldn’t run from archives.

I go for full libraries. This would never work for me! Haha

Thank you for the correction! I thought it was like the PS3 where there was different hardware inside the different models. Well, some of them.

…but wait, if all the internals are the same size, why wasn’t the regular one the size of the Slim? Is it just space from having the disc drive removed?

They’re probably testing on it though

Yes, that was my point, haha

They have what, 3 variants of the console? Regular, Slim, Pro?

Meanwhile on PC…

I believe the comment I replied to changed what it said. I recall something about making it a law that DRM should be removed after a reasonable time period of 1 to 2 years.

I agree that DRM sucks. I didn’t agree that it should be law to remove DRM a year or two after release.

Considering companies can easily sell new copies of games after 2 years, I’d still be fine with a longer period of time. I want developers to make money.

I’ve seen a Kickstarter that would open source their game after 2 years if they raised $4.4 million or so. They didn’t reach that goal, but they open sourced the previous game in the series after about 10 years.

For just removing DRM, I think somewhere between 2 and 10 years is the sweet spot. I mean, I’ve still got 10-year old games on my list I’d be willing to buy, haha

What was the book?

I’d be curious to read about the experiment in particular

If you have some sort of decent antivirus/antimalware like Malwarebytes, that would work for standalone applications to an extent.

Browser extensions are a lot harder to check.

Always make sure you get the RIGHT extension from the PROPER SOURCE. Same with most downloads and app store stuff on your mobile devices, but at least with executables, you can additionally run virus scans for some peace of mind.

Some tips…

• Always make sure you’re accessing the extension’s download/install page from a trusted source.
• Check reviews AND READ THEM. Make sure they don’t look suspicious/bot-generated.
• Consider what permissions you’re giving the extension. Your browser has a lot of personal and sensitive information… including the “keys” to a lot of your accounts. Basically any website that you don’t need to sign into every time you access it? That “key” is stored in your browser.

I believe you can generally trust what permissions an extension or app needs (since the browser/device knows which permission an extension/app uses, and locks them away otherwise), but be wary of the implications of some of them (such as data from other websites, or accessibility features).

then it would be closer to F and not so hard to convert.

So few countries use Fahrenheit that this shouldn’t even be a consideration

I think you’re missing the key part of the problem. It isn’t the AI that’s the issue.

The problem is that he was being paid for how many listeners his AI songs got. But he used bots to “listen” to the songs. Nobody actually listened to his AI music.

The flaw in the system was that they couldn’t detect his bots. (And the bots are not AI)

I didn’t say that it is.

But to your second point, as others have mentioned, body image issues are likely the biggest reason for the change discussed in the OP.

Weightlifting at certain young ages can be harmful. I’m not sure if that’s part of the motivation as I’m not certain what the ages are, but that’s something else to consider.

EDIT: Typo

The point of assignments is to help study for your test.

To me, “assignment” is more of a project. Not rote practice. Applying knowledge to a bit of a longer term, multi-part project.

You’re right. The commenter who made the comparison to Wikipedia made a better point.

I remember teachers telling us not to trust the calculators. What if we hit the wrong key? Lol

Some things never change.

Traditional instruction gave the same result as a bleeding edge ChatGPT tutorial bot.

Interesting way of looking at it. I disagree with your conclusion about the study, though.

It seems like the AI tool would be helpful for things like assignments rather than tests. I think it’s intellectually dishonest to ignore the gains in some environments because it doesn’t have gains in others.

You’re also comparing a young technology to methods that have been adapted over hundreds of thousands of years. Was the first automobile entirely superior to every horse?

I get that some people just hate AI because it’s AI. For the people interested in nuance, I think this study is interesting. I think other studies will seek to build on it.