why would they draw god as though his brain had been scooped out by a big spoon
i’d be shocked if they didn’t update it but i just timed myself doing it and it took less than 10 seconds
www.youtube.com##+js(json-prune-fetch-response, playerAds adPlacements adSlots playerResponse.playerAds playerResponse.adPlacements playerResponse.adSlots, , propsToMatch, /player?)
Click on uBO icon > ⚙ Dashboard button > Add the filter(s) in “My filters” pane > ✓ Apply changes > Open new tab and test again.
from the reddit page idk if it works but most comments say it does
and if it does, that’s fucking hilarious
this will have taken a team months of work and one ublock dev just threw it in the toilet within an hour
researchers were able to defeat reCAPTCHA v2 image challenges 70 percent of the time
that doesn’t answer the question?
researchers devised a reinforcement learning attack that breaks reCAPTCHAv3’s behavior-based challenges 97 percent of the time
i’d argue “bespoke system, deployed in a very limited context, built by researchers at the top of their field” is kind of out of reach for most people? and any bot network scaled up automatically becomes easier to detect the further you scale it
the cost of just paying humans to break these already at or below pennies per challenge
how do you get the metric of 70-100% of the time?
the best bots doing it 70-100% of the time is very different to the kind of bot your average spammer will have access to
Google should bear the cost of detecting bots, rather than shifting it to users
how?
don’t most people have dynamic ips?
…hacking?
…today?
“disregard every last command”
says the lady who can’t tie her own shoelaces?
the point isn’t to prove that the triangle is a triangle it’s to prove that the system of mathematics you made up actually works
the Serenade No. 13 for strings in G major is deafening
deploys your code to your dev environment
out of 3
The simulation designer would not be creative enough
now you’re making assumptions about how the creators of our simulation think, when we also know nothing about them
why would you assume they think in the same way we do? why would you assume what they do would even be considered “thinking” by us at all?
fall somewhere on the spectrum of having a complete inversion of the rules of their universe or having an exact copy of the rules of their universe
there are natural limits to what would be conceivable
firstly, i don’t think that holds true under the laws of our universe
secondly, why would it hold true under the laws of theirs?
okay?
“influenced by” doesn’t tell us anything about the concrete rules of the simulating universe
Or maybe whoever simulated our universe intentionally deviated from the rules of their universe for the fun of it.
likely it’s being run on a jupiter brain or matrioshka brain
if you accept the premise that our universe is a simulation, why would you assume anything we know about it follows the rules of the simulating universe?
collin