Born and raised in London. Just a normal guy with a moral compass.
Not available on mobile, which is sad. I consume 99% of my internet via mobile devices.
They’re not going to serve ads in page outside of sponsored tiles and things of that ilk and there’s been no suggestion otherwise.
There’s already ads in Firefox and every other major browser.
Everyone: Mozilla should find new revenue streams in order to become truly independent.
Mozilla: We’re open to suggestions
Everyone: …
Mozilla: We’re going to explore doing so in an organic method across our products using the methodology that big tech is generating money, but with a Mozilla spin.
Everyone: How dare you!
Use reader mode all the time.
When you parse that code, it presents this ඞ symbol, which looks close enough to the famous characters from Among Us, the viral video game.
That’s a good post.
Aren’t Google and Bing and others paying to be featured in Firefox. What’s the difference?
But if Mozilla can, for example create a sources list and even charge for the ability to be a default on said sources list, wouldn’t that be a double win? The problem with things being unreliable can be dealt with via language. Like big red text saying don’t trust this blindly.
cannot fact check itself let alone anything else. Why don’t you do your own fact checking?
Why don’t I render my own CSS? Firefox has the ability to pull alternative sources in the background and compare against my current page. What is wrong with that?
But the problem is, people think that there’s one single development team working on Firefox and if they’re working on AI, they’re not improving or working on anything else.
People hate the term AI and so Mozilla were always going to struggle with providing modern functionality, as let’s face it, the Internet is embracing AI whether we like it or not
There’s AI in many forms in Firefox such as how it predicts the page you want to revisit from the address bar and translates content locally on device. If these AI capabilities were moved to extensions, it would probably significantly reduce the benefit users get from Firefox and likely prevent other useful features such as privacy preserving AI alternatives.
This is poignant. AI as we know it is basically what we were calling machine learning a couple years ago. The same people that are very vocally complaining about the advent of a smarter browser, are the same people that bemoan Mozilla for depending on Google for financing. Somehow they want a browser that only the most devout privacy evangelists would use and they want a browser that is self-sustained through diverse deals, none of which they’re able to see or feel.
I feel like there’s a lot of disingenuous Firefox supporters who want a utopia browser and refuse to allow Mozilla to do anything to evolve the browser. These same people talk up all the Firefox forks and that change a few defaults and yet bemoan everything Mozilla does that makes those forks possible. It’s boring.
They’re a good registrar in my experience.
I do not know anyone that streams games that wouldn’t happily pay £10 a month
No worries, I figured you were just lost, so tried to point you in the right direction. Since you’re posting via mastodon, just remake the toot and tag those two along with !arduino@lemmy.ca and you should, with any luck get the right eyes on your conundrum.
You want !sbcs@lemux.minnix.dev or !python@programming.dev
Should we be worried about the future of IPTV or is it fine?