Commercial drugs are giving people life long diseases on top of the ones they’re trying to cure?
News to me, got any source?
Commercial drugs are giving people life long diseases on top of the ones they’re trying to cure?
News to me, got any source?
No no.
In addition to
And stop pretending that the only people to use this are those that would absolutely need it. You know damn well penny pinchers would also go after this
Here’s a fun thought, the drug you make fails but doesn’t kill you.
Instead you now have another life long ailment that cause pain/degradation of daily life.
Sounds like a great idea.
God damn right. They want to outsource jobs AND cause people harm due to their ignorance?? (lead pipes, lead paint, asbestos, need I say more)
Fuck that.
Is this satire or
You’ve discovered an artifact!! Yaaaay
If you ask GPT to do this in a more math questiony way, itll break it down and do it correctly. Just gotta narrow top_p and temperature down a bit
Trying to interpret grammar/meaning for what is obviously a real-world schizo post is where u made your first mistake
All these comments about adblockers - you’re truly naive if you think those are going to last in any capacity.
Chrome/Edge are already going to be neutering the majority of the functionality with manifest v3.
Firefox is already starting to see some commercialization/enshitification with this new exec. Adblocker days are numbered. Soon they’ll be streaming the ads in-line with the videos everywhere and you’ll need to have a special hacked up rig just to content filter and be forced to sit in silence for X minutes.
Just because the problem is at your neighbors house, doesn’t mean it won’t come to yours.
Right, which means it can be fairly considered when discussing the real crux of the issue with AI and big tech companies right now, which is the monetization of other peoples content.
If we’re discussing this, we should be looking at whether or not companies are doing this, given they have motive and specific, relevant circumstance to enact such behavior.
Lack of evidence means you need to investigate for said evidence. It does not mean you should not investigate. Privacy advocates, members of any org/cert with an ethics statement should be blowing the whistle on any kind of activity that would mean a users data is not being deleted upon their request, especially considering reddits global usage.
Alright well I guess evidence is needed before we can have ideas - crazy
Content is absolutely archived and they have financial incentive to restore the quality of their “knowledge base”
That’s a fair amount of circumstance and motivation to support my idea, regardless of tangible evidence
You’re ignoring the idea that they could still be working on a way to restore content and haven’t completed that process yet
Or that they could start feeding your archived (not cached) data directly to the AI companies anyway for a price
IMO, you can win by jamming your “transmissions” with noise. It’s easier to hide in noise as noise than it Is to be silent IMO. Muddy the waters as it were
Watch how quickly I drop your fucking platform lmao. Please give me a reason
To those who are curious enough, try setting up a web scraper. Search for innocuous, perhaps popular but simple words, in a Bing image search. Now look at all the URLs and start grouping by domains.
From my experience in the field, Bing has a problem with malicious websites w/ images that pop up in these results and serve fake AV alert phishing sites.
Stay curious y’all, data analytics can be fun and enlightening
When they try to tell you it’s the blue haired people fighting for other peoples rights to love who they love and have access to medical care, remember this.
Remember who the monsters are.
Right, I wouldn’t say they’re separate by any means but I’m sure they all have their own strings and lines in the sand, wouldn’t say there’re one in the same quite yet
Nothings ever that black and white
I think it’s more likely that MS is trying to cover its ass and maintain credibility with arguably their largest customer, the US govt, and is blocking the fuck out of any inquiries
The US needs to end its reliance on big tech and businesses in general. You’re supposed to be a governing body, not party to the countries diseased economic system run by the ultra rich.
Your post and subsequent comments say quite the opposite - they’re oozing ego-charged.
Try coming from a place of genuine curiosity and not “this is wrong and stupid”
I’m not interested in bickering with you about semantics of social conduct. Black boxing applications from disposable/abusable mechanisms is absolutely a-okay in cybersecurity terms.
The cognitive dissonance in this Jesus Christ
You don’t think providing an email from a throw away service would strike the software as a malicious user/spam bot???
You keep talking like you know everything and then step onto rakes and start screaming about how it’s the gardeners fault (you live alone and do the gardening, naturally)
Very interesting, I wasn’t aware of specifics. Obviously I don’t think it’s impossible, but I would think that the grand majority don’t, while this bootleg technique would have a higher rate of creating worse problems for people already suffering and essentially sealing their fate.
We need to tackle big pharma for the problem it is: greed and neglect and I don’t think a pirated solution will make that in any way better for people.
Maybe it does for some but hurts others worse. Which is the same coin as big pharma but worse for some. That’s my perspective, but I hope that an open-source style solution would gain more traction rather than one that’s essentially just ripped music.
People deserve to be healthy