It’s not a place or group, it’s an interval of time. Approximately 15 seconds.

THAT’s the bitch. You beat me to it

Substack! It’s very academic-coded but you don’t have to be a real professional of any kind. I think you just have to be aesthetically pleasing enough for people to think you are intelligent. I read a guy on reddit talking about how he’d just get drunk and try to get people to flirt with him.

Give me a second. I have to remember the name. It’s pretty mainstream, I think people will dislike that I’ve described it the way I did when I drop the name.

That formal blog place. The one with all the art hoes but it isn’t art, it’s like philosophy and collegiate stuff. I’m spacing the name.

You made that up –.–

Gin’d up. Get out o’ here

Maybe this is on me for engaging to the extent I did, then. I definitely had set out to have a conversation about how religious groups should be more welcome on Lemmy.

I’ll consider what you’re saying about it being a choice that shouldn’t be given the same graces as statuses given through birth. There’s something developing there, but I’m going to have to reflect on that for a while.

But you should consider how on one part of your argument you’re saying women are being compelled to wear their garb and then concluding that belonging to religious frameworks is strictly a choice. This is walking right past their autonomy in a very selectively invalidating kind of way. Though I’m going to try to just take the merits of what you’re saying and leave the rest.

To my knowledge religious status is protected by law from discrimination in the US to the same extent all those others are? Laws are a poor measure of morality but it’s saving the jobs of women who need to wear religious garments in professional settings so it seems moral.

But looking at that church’s Wikipedia page it looks like they’re one of the only denominations to be institutionally changing to include LGBTQ. Seems a little curmudgeonly to say they’re outside the scope of inclusion, especially given the resounding victories progressivism is having in the united states lately

Not very inclusive. Do episcopals have some sort of stigma I’m unaware of?

One of my favorite observations about ecology through the lens of intelligent design is statistically if you have to assume God intended the earth to have a main character, everyone’s ignoring the sheer, incomparably wide amount of focus he seemed to have on making different beetles.

Humans were clearly the side project. Visible stars that you can see? Also a minor detail for his beetle planet. Saurians and fish? Background characters for beetle planet. His chosen people, the Jews and their long history? A subplot in season 20 of Beetle Planet. God is autistic like the guy who invented Pokémon. This planet was made for 400000 species of beetles

deleted by creator

“marvel comic artist drawing psylocke”-type profile

2000’s numetal song lyrics

I need to be the human who is chosen to receive that trophy. How best to go about this?

A. Criminalizing it is effective for suppressing women and Lgbt in the workforce.

B. It helps relegate sex to a commodity that’s tied to people’s ability to build nuclear families instead of one that’s just accessible with money. Places like the US like sex to be a commodity, but it’s more valuable as something that makes men get married and seek exploitative work instead of something they can simply buy.

Facehugger walks away alive. I think that means it didn’t jump on him?

Literally a hate crime 💀 good looking making sure nobody got confused

Tag the account. They’re doing a bit

Now why would they be referring to Mexico?