Amazing: surprisingly simple, yet complex and fun! Also there’s the added bonus that you get to vent, ha.
Amazing: surprisingly simple, yet complex and fun! Also there’s the added bonus that you get to vent, ha.
thought about it, too!
(and… not sure if it’s Jerboa, but the image appears emoji-sized to me. a bite-sized comic, hehe)
that toast must really be evil…
is this common for xkcd? because then I’ve been missing a whole layer of all the comics I’ve stumbled upon.
Thanks for the nuanced response. Obviously both FP and LTT are defending their own interests and neither are inherently better.
thanks, bot. i wouldn’t know otherwise that this post on c/selfhosted is about #selfhosted
Oh, i get it! Yeah, 30% is a considerable percentage.
Where I work (text-based customer support), a few weeks ago I stumbled upon a spreadsheet analysing that they could “save” 25% in wages by implementing GPT-4.
It may still be mostly humans on the line, but 1 out 4 of us may get the boot.
I don’t think it’s perceived as good? (curious, why would it be?) Just that it’s disingenuous to market it as AI. Everyone and their mother now has “”“AI”“” 🤷♂️
I’ll forever be skeptical of a degoogled OS that runs only on phones engineered by Google.
I assume having them split by the predefined categories, instead of juggling all the open windows.
Then again, I don’t know other alt-tab options.
at that point I start recycling them, and go back to parenthesis.
so when bp = 300x - 3, this:
4( 4[ 4{ 15bp + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
would turn to
4( 4[ 4{ 15( 300x - 3) + 10 } - 375 ] - 2250 ) - 15000
perhaps not the best, but I rather stick to conventional symbols rather than using… idk, question marks? that’d be funny as hell, though
just picture it:
4© 4« 4¿ 15bp + 10 ? - 375 » - 2250 🄯 - 15000